Thomas B. Shea - Getty Images
I think we just captured one of Young's three missed tackles on the season.
Pro Football Focus' latest review of the 2011 season takes a look at how well the safeties in the league tackled. Thankfully, none of the members of the Browns were ranked among the worst in tackle efficiency. In fact, it was quite the contrary -- both current and former Browns were among the league's best in this regard.
Let's start with this category covered by PFF: the top 20 tackling safeties in coverage, and how many tackles they missed. Coming in first place on the list was former Browns safety Abram Elam. There were 37 times in which he had an opportunity to make a tackle in coverage, and he didn't miss a single one. Eight other safeties shared this same achievement (not allowing a missed tackle in coverage), including Mike Adams. Adams had 20 attempts and made the tackle every time. Not too far behind was Usama Young, placing at No. 10 overall. He was the only player who missed just 1 tackle in coverage (on 27 attempts).
The other category that PFF featured was "The Surest Twenty." This included every possible play, not just pass plays. Adams wasn't on this list, but T.J. Ward and Young were. Young missed just 3 tackles all season on 57 attempts, coming in at No. 4 on the list. Ward ranked No. 6 overall, missing just 2 tackles on 34 attempts. PFF specifically pointed out this achievement by the duo:
The Browns also find themselves with a pair of players inside the Top 10, with Usama Young and T.J. Ward combining for just five missed tackles. To put that into some perspective, Tanard Jackson missed five tackles in a single game, against the Saints in Week 9.
Nice. Adams is a free agent this offseason, but I don't think the position will undergo much change next season unless Sheldon Brown makes the switch to safety.
0 recs | 92 comments
I’m not sure how accurate this is but I did feel Young’s missed tackles were epic fails and that’s what earned him a somewhat undeserved rap as a bad tackler. He could be a very aggressive tackler so when he does miss, it looks really bad?
HenryDawg - January 25, 2012
Jauron seemed to single him out as a guy who was a good tackler throughout the season. I would assume he knows his own players pretty well but those misses definitely stand out for some reason.
rufio - January 26, 2012
This makes a lot of sense to me. Perhaps safety isn’t as big of a need as we thought?
Legoman0721 - January 26, 2012 via Android app
It would be nice to have a ball hawking S in the Ed Reed mold, plus a hitter like Ward. Young used to be a CB so and I think FS is his more natural position.
HenryDawg - January 26, 2012
This is all good n well until we can stop the run. There’s a reason DQ wasn’t voted comeback player. Everyone in our “secondary” is awesome.
The New Kardiac Kids - January 25, 2012
Your DQ hate is really odd.
Bernie19Kosar - January 25, 2012
Also some of the hate on our run defense is pretty odd. It needed to get much better against the Texans (a very good running team) and that one game against the ravens. For most of the other games it was not terrible. Not always great, but not terrible.
rufio - January 26, 2012
What?
I mean I guess it could be debated that the statistic could be exaggerated for the fact many teams didn’t bother passing. But It’s pretty sad for someone to think that the run defense wasn’t terrible.
And I don’t know whats more ridiculous, someone trying to convincing themselves the run defense wasn’t bad itself or the fact that they would be bold enough to think such a thing considering we gave up 150 yards rushing ypg, 125 first downs, had many games where the opponents had close to 100 yard before halftime, or the fact that this happened against a soft group of competition. If that isn’t “terrible”, I don’t know what the heck is. Giving up 5.6 ypc to leon washington is pretty scary.
The Licensed Pessimist - January 26, 2012
I agree with TLP, although I do think our run defence will be solid next season. After all, we did have a new and largely inexperienced line. And our LBs got better as the season went on.
JohnW81 - January 26, 2012 via mobile
I agree that there is a lot of reason to be optimistic about our run defense. We have a lot of young players, we’ll get better.
Legoman0721 - January 26, 2012 via Android app
The YPA was tied for 19th at 4.4 yards. I agree that isnt good, but I wouldnt call it terrible. I think the fix is more in the front 4. Taylor needs to do a better job and we need to improve RDE. Getting TJ back helps a lot too.
-bobby- - January 27, 2012
Don’t even bother, he’s made up his mind after watching the games once.
rufio - January 28, 2012
7 carries for Leon Washington. Care to find a smaller sample size?
Bernie19Kosar - January 27, 2012
I don’t hate him….I have called him a consummate pro. I just want a Harrison type back there at mike. And obviously I would rather not be 29th in the league in rush yards allowed at 147.4.
The New Kardiac Kids - January 26, 2012
Harrison is not a middle linebacker.
notthatnoise - January 26, 2012
I know, I’m still thinking headhunter.
The New Kardiac Kids - January 26, 2012
Maybe I put this in the wrong spot….
The YPA was tied for 19th at 4.4 yards. I agree that isnt good, but I wouldnt call it terrible. I think the fix is more in the front 4. Taylor needs to do a better job and we need to improve RDE. Getting TJ back helps a lot too.
-bobby- - January 27, 2012
DQ was not the reason for our poor rush D. It had more to do with having 3 linemen and 2 linebackers who were below average against the rush.
Roger Dorn - January 26, 2012
I agree. That is why I still would not be shocked to see us trade down and look at defensive side of the ball when drafting. Our defense was improved but it was not where it needs to be. If they do not take Griffin, I could see some more wheeling and dealing and acquiring more defensive talent.
champion64 - January 26, 2012
Yeah, I totally agree with this. If they don’t go with Griffin it would be nice to see them turn that pick into more.
The New Kardiac Kids - January 26, 2012
If you say so, apparently on this team the mike isn’t responsible for tackling runners that get past the D-line or making it to the QB on blitzes.
The New Kardiac Kids - January 26, 2012
I think playing between 2 dead bodies probably doesn’t help DQ at all.
PaduaDSP - January 26, 2012
Probably not….I see what I see…..my hate on him isn’t that thick, and Joe Thomas only knows why we went to a 4-3 defensive front when the best defenses use a 3-4. Jauron obviously. But it doesn’t ease my frustration at our inability to stop the effin run.
The New Kardiac Kids - January 26, 2012
the 4-3 is what Holmgren and Heckert are comfortable with as well. It’s not like our defense as a 3-4 was any better at stopping the run over the last 5-6 years.
PaduaDSP - January 26, 2012
I totally agree. We have had a serious lack of talent at linebacker and DE. I was just saying the best defenses are 3-4s. SF, BAL, HOU. Where’s Jamir Miller when you need him? lol
The New Kardiac Kids - January 26, 2012
There’s no intrinsic advantage in running a 3-4 rather than a 4-3. It just depends on what kinds of talent you have and can get to fit either scheme.
Legoman0721 - January 26, 2012 via Android app
Eh. There is intrinsic advantage in the fact that a DC does either or, not what fits. Obviously, people think one or the other has an advantage or else we would still have Ryan here running our new 4-3
SpecialBrownie - January 26, 2012
Well of course you should have coaches that can teach the scheme, that’s why we don’t have Marty running our WCO. That has nothing to do with one scheme or another being superior.
Legoman0721 - January 26, 2012 via Android app
Then why choose 3-4 over a 4-3 and still with it throughout your career? It’s because there are ideals that one is superior to another. It has everything to do with it.
SpecialBrownie - January 26, 2012
Because most coaches feel it’s better to master one scheme rather than being decent in several? Tell me, what advantages are there in running a 3-4? Also, just as a 3-4 is different from a 4-3, there are multiple variations of those as well. There is not a “one true” 3-4 that is superior.
Legoman0721 - January 26, 2012 via Android app
3-4 are extremely more versatile. You can actually fit more player types into a 3-4 than 4-3. I like a defense with more roaming LB, than trench DL.
SpecialBrownie - January 26, 2012
You also have to have a lot of good linebackers, which we don’t have.
HenryDawg - January 26, 2012
Ryan severly limted our D but I think if we would’ve finally seen DQ in it, the LB corps would’ve improved immensely.
SpecialBrownie - January 26, 2012
this is true
HenryDawg - January 26, 2012
Ah, there it is. YOU like more roaming linebackers in your defense. It comes down to preference. I prefer putting athletes in a simple scheme and letting them play without having to think much. Neither scheme is intrinsically superior.
Also, I don’t believe that more players can fit a 3-4 as opposed to a 4-3. What proof of this do you have?
Legoman0721 - January 26, 2012 via Android app
All I’m saying is that preference wise, this is always superiority. You don’t learn the scheme of the WCO because you flipped a coin, you picked it because you thought it had advantages over other schemes.
SpecialBrownie - January 26, 2012
There is not an objective advantage to either of these schemes, though. Coaches are generally brought up in a certain way and they stick with the general ideas that their “school” trained them in. Some coaches are more suited to one scheme or another, but that doesn’t mean that a 3-4 is actually better than a 4-3.
Legoman0721 - January 26, 2012 via Android app
the reason Houston got better on D has little to do with switching to a 3-4.
bross09 - January 26, 2012
But switching to the mindset of flooding the front 7 with good players and high picks, and getting after the QB from anywhere and everywhere.
I’d like to see us draft more pass rushers and turn into a Spagnuolo/Johnson style D. It probably won’t happen.
rufio - January 26, 2012
I agree. I would like that style too.
bross09 - January 26, 2012
That Under front and all those fronts with two 3-techs and both LBs showing blitz up in the A-gaps are my favorite.
rufio - January 28, 2012
I have always liked 4-3s that blitz. Jim Johnson, Spags (I belive their schemes though are significantly different)
bross09 - January 28, 2012
also, 5 out of the top 10 Ds in points are 4-3 teams.
bross09 - January 26, 2012
Can you check how they fared in W/L?
The New Kardiac Kids - January 26, 2012
NM I did…there were 4 teams in the top ten in rush yardage allowed running a 4-3….Cincinnati and Atlanta were the 2 successful teams. Of the remaining teams playing, one runs a 4-3 and one runs a 3-4. This is a wash in my opinion.
The New Kardiac Kids - January 26, 2012
We tried the 3-4 for something like 7 seasons. It wasn’t working. Why force your front office to fill a defense that is broken, and out of their norm?
Bernie19Kosar - January 27, 2012
Yeah, its not like he had a career year behind those “dead bodies” or anything.
rufio - January 26, 2012
Sorry if I sounded like a dick here Dorn.
The New Kardiac Kids - January 26, 2012
He is partially responsible and did an admirable job considering he was among the league leaders in tackles.
Roger Dorn - January 26, 2012
I am not sure that is best measurement of how good a job a LB is doing, didn’t Andra Davis lead the league in tackles a couple times?
PaduaDSP - January 26, 2012
If he didn’t lead, he was amongst the leaders…
Much like DQ, they don’t let anyone by them (admirable as that is).
But they don’t seem poised to attack the way you see other teams MLBs doing.
This may be what the scheme calls for. OR it may be the way the particular individuals play.
Only Jauron would know (Joe Thomas too, of course)
mr.saturday.night - January 26, 2012
yeah it seems to me that DQ reads and diagnoses plays well and then gets to a spot where he know he can make a sure tackle and stop the runner. it’s just that usually that spot is 3-4 yards past the LOS and rarely in the backfield or right at the LOS. He also doesn’t make many game changing plays. He is just average in coverage. I mean he is the best LB we have but that doesn’t make him much better than above average as I see it.
PaduaDSP - January 26, 2012
I am curious where you get this 3-4 yard downfield information, because DQ was also doing a phenomenal job in TFL all season long.
Roger Dorn - January 26, 2012
I think it might be a holdover from DQ’s reputation pre-injury.
Legoman0721 - January 26, 2012 via Android app
I can’t seem to locate TFL stats anywhere. I just don’t recall many plays were DQ had TFL. I guess it’s just my perception that he is constantly in position to make a tackle but that it is rarely in the opponents backfield.
PaduaDSP - January 26, 2012
Link
Jackson was 23rd in TFL which is pretty impressive given the names ahead of him are almost exclusively DE/OLB. I think only Navarro Bowman was a Mike linebacker to finish higher.
Roger Dorn - January 26, 2012
I’d actually caveat pretty impressive and say it is extremely impressive.
Roger Dorn - January 26, 2012
I believe Daryl Washington played ILB in a 3-4, but that’s also a different scheme. He is still easily top 5 out of guys who don’t rush the passer (3-4 OLBs, Kiwanuka, Vonn miller)
bross09 - January 26, 2012
My biggest knock on DQ coming into this season was that he never seemed to make impact plays. That changed in a big way this season.
Bernie19Kosar - January 27, 2012
this is all sorts of wrong right now. I understand if you are talking about previous years, but he had 12 TFLs this year which is a great number. That’s about 3rd among all mlbs/ilbs.
bross09 - January 26, 2012
This is not the point……150 yards allowed a game is the point.
The New Kardiac Kids - January 26, 2012
The mike for lack of a better definition is the QB of the D. It’s not getting done.
The New Kardiac Kids - January 26, 2012
Completely the wrong way to look at it. First of all, the yards per game is skewed because the offense sucks and teams just keep running.
Secondly, mike is far from fitting the definition of a QB on D. a great QB affects every other position on the field. It frees up the run game, Lineman have to hold their blocks for shorter, and WRs have easier catches.
How does mike affect the play of the DTs? Or the Safeties? Heck, even a guy like Urlacher doesn’t have a hugely discernable impact on his fellow LBs.
bross09 - January 26, 2012
And why do teams keep running?
The New Kardiac Kids - January 26, 2012
This is a kindergarten answer…because they can. Mike brings the d-play into the huddle and should be the audible guy. We don’t stop the run…..I can’t say it any more clearly.
The New Kardiac Kids - January 27, 2012
To think that because our rush D was poor means that every one of the 11 players on defense sucks at stopping the run means you aren’t seeing things very clearly at all.
Roger Dorn - January 27, 2012
I like you, you’re well thought out and intrinsically spot on most of the time, but I never said anything about the other ten guys on D.
The New Kardiac Kids - January 28, 2012
Or because they are up 20 points and don’t have to worry about the offense scoring. Stop being so condescending.
Rushing yards don’t correlate 100% with MLB performance.
rufio - January 28, 2012
I apologize, the kindergarten thing was a little condescending.
The New Kardiac Kids - January 28, 2012
like I pointed out, because they have the lead. If it’s the 3rd quarter and a team is up by over a TD, what is the incentive to pass? They want to keep the clock running because it’s a numbers game and if they can keep us from scoring before the time runs out, they win. Its simple strategy.
bross09 - January 27, 2012
and 19th in YPA with 4.4 yards. Its not all on DQ. I think Mitchell/RDE and Taylor share a lot of the blame at the point of attack. Holding assignments, not getting pushed out of your whole, staying put when needed, etc. How many runs were gashed through the right side of our D? Improving RDE will improve the run D. Also, improving our offense will improve the run D. Think about that one (ehhh? yaa?).
-bobby- - January 27, 2012
An offense that puts points on the board will improve the run defense by forcing opponents to pass more. We’ve seen that many coaches lose their nerve and abandon the run if they go down by 10 points.
Legoman0721 - January 27, 2012 via Android app
ehhhh yaa You single handedly changed my whole (hole?) perception of our run D. Thanks. I’m good now.
The New Kardiac Kids - January 28, 2012
Yards per game has some meaning, but it doesn’t mean everything. I would contend that it didn’t mean a whole lot at all.
rufio - January 28, 2012
He was amongst the league leaders and also had a very good season that year. It’s not the best indicator of future performance maybe, but it is a pretty good indicator that guys that have mass quantities of tackles are usually very good linebackers.
Roger Dorn - January 26, 2012
The MLB is responsible for his gap based on back flow. And flocking to the ball once the play has broken (this is everyone on defense’s responsibility). DQ took care of both things quite well.
rufio - January 26, 2012
The mike definitely isn’t a blitzer, so I don’t know where you got that from.
And he did tackle the guys who got past the line. That’s why he was second in the league in tackles.
notthatnoise - January 26, 2012
They freed him up to blitz this year. As soon as he read run against some teams he would knife the A-gap. And he had more sacks this year than just about every other year combined.
rufio - January 26, 2012
same with TFLs and possibly overall QB pressures.
bross09 - January 26, 2012
3.5
The New Kardiac Kids - January 26, 2012
He didn’t have many throughout his career.
rufio - January 28, 2012
Everyone is a blitzer on an all out blitz.
The New Kardiac Kids - January 26, 2012
what? He racked up tons of tackles on runners past the D-Line…but not way far downfield.
few LBs who weren’t “pass rushing LBs” got more pressures on the QB. I can only go by Advanced NFL Stats’ numbers which only include sacks and QB hits but he ranks high. He is second among 4-3 mlbs and still top 5/top 10 when you include 3-4 ILBs and 4-3 OLBs.
bross09 - January 26, 2012
That pic makes me sic. Tate made Young look like a damn fool on that TD run.
Brownie's Year - January 26, 2012
The Texans made us look like fools all game long.
rufio - January 26, 2012
No doubt. Houston made us look like a Pop Warner team early. We won the second half though.
Brownie's Year - January 26, 2012
Hooray!
rufio - January 26, 2012
With all due respect to PFF’s analysis, read this story from PFW and tell me that Young is the type of guy that can fill that role for the Browns.
Maybe it’s too much of a luxury pick to take Smith/Martin/Iloka with a day two selection when there are other more pressing concerns, but if one of these guys is BPA when we’re picking, pull the trigger and take them.
The great (terrible?) thing about the lack of talent on this team right now is that there are lot of acceptable choices that can be made in this draft. The front office just can’t afford to reach for need when there are so few positions out there that couldn’t stand to be improved.
SpotOnSpotwood - January 26, 2012
Iloka….I love this guy.
The New Kardiac Kids - January 26, 2012
I disagree with “so many” we have a nice core set-up…..I truly believe we are on the cusp of turning it around….this brings me back to coaching. Joe Thomas knows I hope we get an apt OC.
The New Kardiac Kids - January 26, 2012
You know…if you read into the double negative.
The New Kardiac Kids - January 26, 2012
I’m just thinking we NEED a QB, WR, DE, WLB, and S. Cases could be made for both a G and a T on offense and a MLB on defense, not to mention that we may need another RB.
Taking this a step further, as any team trying to progress from bottom of the barrel status, this team needs to be deeper. If we’re worried about the level of talent of the starting LBs, what does that say about their backups?
SpotOnSpotwood - January 27, 2012
You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Dawgs By Nature to post a comment.