I noticed something that the St. Louis Rams did during our preseason game that perfectly illustrated the impact of personnel and formation on the game.
With the game tied at zero, the Browns’ defense found themselves backed up deep in their own territory. The Rams initially set up in a formation with two WRs, a TE and RB Steven Jackson to the right, with one WR tight left. Here, you can see as the Rams doing their "mike points*". Not as visible, the Browns are showing Man coverage with 2 deep safeties:

(*in BoB blocking schemes, the OL is responsible for the 4 down linemen and whoever is designated the "Mike", not necessarily the MLB, who is incidentally also called a "Mike")
QB AJ Feeley notices that if the Browns are indeed in Man underneath and the four Browns showing rush are in fact coming after the Quarterback, that LB Scott Fujita and CB Brandon McDonald are left to cover RB Steven Jackson and TE Daniel Fells.
Basically, what Feeley sees is this:
I smell a mismatch (Feeley does too).
Side note: For the life of me I don’t know why we are in a Dime package here, or why we didn’t do some Maneuvering to get McDonald on a WR (say, playing McDonald on the WR, CB Sheldon Brown at FS and bringing S TJ Ward down to cover the TE).
Even the most unashamed Brandon McDonald apologist cringes at the thought of the cornerback trying to tackle a 272 pound TE or one of the league's most bruising running backs. Repressed as my Browns memories are, I think it is safe to say a few B-Mac "tackles" have qualified as Tosh.0 Web Redemption-worthy.
Seeing that one of his two big guys will be matched up against McDonald, Feeley sends Jackson in motion:
Previously, it was unclear who McDonald was responsible for because Jackson and Fells were so close to each other in the formation. Figuring out which bruising runner had the mismatch may have taken Feeley a second or more, which is all it takes for NFL linemen to get hits on the quarterback. With Jackson spread wide, the matchup becomes clear pre-snap.
Due to this change in formation, the Browns must also adjust. Fujita goes out with Jackson, and McDonald is revealed as being responsible for Fells:
Fujita is now the closest Browns defender to the bottom of the screen, guarding Jackson who is wide to the offense's left by the numbers. After the motion, Feeley sees something more like this:
To me, it looks like the Rams scouted this and knew they could get these matchups. I think they were ready with their play if they saw this look from us. I am not a lip-reader, and I am not even sure I would understand the Rams’ terminology if I knew what they were saying, but I think this was a check that Feeley made.
Regardless of the original play call, the motion itself (formation change) revealed the matchup that the Rams wanted and clarified for them what defense we were in.
The Rams ended up running the Smash concept to both sides of the field. At the simplest level, all the "Smash" concept is is an inside receiver on a corner route, and an outside receiver on a hitch:
If you want to know more about the Smash concept, Chris Brown is one of the best.
Here, with Smash to both sides of the field, I believe Fells runs a Stick route. He will stem his route inside at about a 45 degree angle, then get open according to what the defense is doing. The play looks like this:
McDonald cannot be correct. If he has leverage to the left of Fells, Fells will bounce out right. If McDonald defends Fells on the right, he will bounce left. The best McDonald can do is force a perfect throw, fight the ball, and then try to bring the receiver down if he does catch it.
Effectively, all the Smash concept is doing on either side of the field is clearing space. Look at how much space Fells has to work in and McDonald has to cover!
Fells has three widths of the hashes and from the line of scrimmage to the goal posts to work McDonald.
Sure enough, Fells puts a little juke on McDonald, catches an easy throw, and drags Brandon into the endzone.
Touchdown Rams, thanks in no small part to a skilled use of formation and personnel.
3 recs | 31 comments
In all my years of reading football stories, nobody has ever broken down formations and plays like this. For someone who never played organized football, this goes a long way to improve my understanding of the game. Rufio, you rock.
dawgtribe - August 24, 2010
Seconded, exactly.
LondonBrown - August 24, 2010
Great Stuff!! I hope you do this every week. We all learned something.
Red-Right-88 - August 24, 2010
Thanks guys, I’ll do my best to keep this sort of thing coming during the season. No promises while I am in school.
rufio - August 24, 2010
Good stuff rufio
And thanks for coming by TST to link to this.
3k - August 24, 2010
No prob, best of luck to you guys. Hopefully we’ll see you in a Super Bowl in a few years.
rufio - August 24, 2010
good stuff man, You could tell somebody noticed something because jackson pointed the matchup out to feeley and then bolted out wide like something was up.
jaws. - August 24, 2010
They both looked excited when they took a look at the defense, didn’t they?
rufio - August 24, 2010
Rufio, you are a complete and total genius. We want you to be the browns o cordinator instead of daboll!!!!!
brownsboy14 - August 24, 2010 via mobile
Ha! Give Daboll a break. He’ll be better this year. I think he’s learned a lot from his first year calling plays and the offense should look a lot better with guys like Moore, Watson, Hardesty, Hillis, and Delhomme stepping into key roles.
I still question some of his plays, but in general they make a lot more sense to me so far this preseason with some of the guys we have in place now.
rufio - August 24, 2010
the only call i questioned was the hillis run on a 4th and 3. thats a bit long to run right up the gut and you could see the whole stadium knew hillis was getting it. I think if you are going to gamble and go for it on that 4th down you have to put the ball in the hands of your quarterback there.
jaws. - August 24, 2010
That’s fair. You think we make that same call in the regular season?
rufio - August 25, 2010
The Great Rufio!
Another great breakdown of an offensive concept. I am not saying we don’t do this when we are on offense,but, why don’t we do it more.This also opens up a “scramble to here” area for the QB if the defense would come with a blitz.I really love the work that you put in to dissect the offensive and defensive reactions.The photos and videos really show the scheme.My only complaint is why haven’t you asked Daboll out for a working dinner somewhere? Keep up the good work. Do you have all of your articles consolidated somewhere? I can’t say “Great Job” enough.
DevilDawg56 - August 24, 2010
We do an OK job of getting dangerous matchups. The problem was that last year we didn’t have guys to create those kinds of matchups.
Teams could dare Royal to catch the ball because they knew he was awful as a receiver. Teams could dare BQ to throw deep and to the outside, and DA to throw passes into the flat. etc.
We did a decent job of getting defenses to put LBs on Braylon, which was a great matchup but he wasn’t exactly giving it his all last year. We also did a solid job of getting these kinds of matchups in the run game: Vickers on a safety, Royal on a CB, etc.
You are very correct about a QB scramble against C-2 man. Dangerous, especially against a guy like Dixon or VY.
I think Chris was considering making a place for all the stuff I’ve done, but I think you can just search DBN for “rufio” or “rufio’s playbook” and find most of it. Thanks for the feedback.
rufio - August 24, 2010
your tivo skills are ninja like…..
sleepy042 - August 24, 2010
Is anyone else having issues with new comments not showing up properly? They aren’t showing on the home page below each article/post and they aren’t showing up within the actual posts either???
I tried logging out and then logging back in, but it didn’t do any good.
Kimble_79 - August 24, 2010
never mind, they just started working…thanks
Kimble_79 - August 24, 2010
This is excellent, thanks again.
One has to wonder if the Browns will do more to protect against these kinds of mismatches.
Roger Dorn - August 24, 2010
I think we will. I am hoping this is just a preseason problem, or at least a “first two games of the preseason” problem. Ryan knows what he is doing. I am hoping he is just playing chess, showing what he want to show, not bringing out all his pieces while he sets OCs up.
Even if we do end up in this kind of matchup, we can always do a better job of disguising it and trying to make the QB process information after the snap. Another second or two and Fells doesn’t have time to do his juke before Feeley gets hit in the mouth. A lot of our pre-snap movements and posturing is designed to confuse the reads of the offense, hopefully everything is more coordinated in week 1.
rufio - August 24, 2010
I can confirm this is very true.
Ryan Kelsey - August 24, 2010
Lol, had you in mind. Myself as well, though my opinion of him took a big hit last year.
rufio - August 24, 2010
same here. I was much more of an apologist before last year’s anti-tackle clinic.
Ryan Kelsey - August 24, 2010
About the Browns D
Hey rufio, nice work. I understand you’re using this to illustrate the offense using motion to do a couple things, and using route combos to clear the field and dictating a huge mismatch of a big TE on a 4th CB ….
But why are the Browns playing a loose Man Under 2 Deep when it’s 3rd and 8 on own 9? (only see Sheldon jam his guy a little) Is it just because this is just preseason? What would be a better call instead? Or something Fujita could’ve audibled to? I figure if they wanted to play man, shouldn’t they have at least played a tight Man Free, and bumped those slot WRs and send a little blitz? Or some sort of zone blitz or at least have a couple guys drop in zone under to take away passing lanes into the zone zone? Isn’t the goal in that situation to prevent a first down/TD, ie, okay with giving up any completions underneath for 7 yards or fewer?
opchee - August 24, 2010
Rob Ryan likes to go to C2 man on 3rd and longer yardage because it is designed to take away throws that will result in the first down. If I am Ryan and I have a chance to redo this play, I would probably just put another LB in the game in place of McDonald. That’s probably the simplest way to do it. If we check to a 3-3 fire zone concept (with McDonald out wide and Fujita in the middle) or C-3 zone and we execute well, that probably would have worked on 3rd and 8/9. But it is easy to second guess the playcall now that we know what the offense was doing.
We actually covered the Smash combos really well; Fujita had an easy job in covering Jackson, who wasn’t expecting the ball. Brown had the outside leverage on his WR, with TJ Ward on the inside bracketing. The WR on the hitch on the opposite side of the field (covered by Haden) was going to get a couple of yards at most. Wright actually got beat to the outside and his WR was open for a TD if Feeley can make a good throw, but that is an execution problem, not a strategic one.
Honestly, if McDonald just does his job and brings the TE down as soon as he catches the ball, this is a field goal and a victory for the defense.
rufio - August 24, 2010
Yeah, the corner routes are covered well, and they are harder plays that require stick throws anyways, especially when you expect the safeties to bracket the slots, which REALLY opened up the middle.
.
Yeah, but to be fair, it’s hard for any CB to take down a 272 lbs TE in that situation. McDonald’s giving up 100 pounds. Once he bit on that Feeley shoulder fake and hopped left, and Feeley threw to his right, it was all over. When you have a big TE iso’ed like that with a little separation in space, even if a big LB like a Fujita/Trusnik is in there, I don’t know if it’ll make too much of a diff. It was a good play by the Rams. Nothing earth shattering, everything just worked the way they are supposed to.
opchee - August 24, 2010
I think Fujita makes the tackle.
rufio - August 25, 2010
Beautiful breakdown, Rufio. The sketch had me wondering something. Could this play be disrupted a bit if the left DE jams the TE at the line? You mentioned that another second and the QB doesn’t have time to get the play off. I’m looking for a way to beat your Kobayashi (sp?) Maru.
JustBob - August 24, 2010
Maybe, depends how much of a jam he can get. The “DE” there was actually one of our LBs, so he could have legitimately played press man.
If he either jams then rushes or jams then drops, you sacrifice some pass rush for coverage so it would mean we would have had to cover longer to get a pressure/sack. Who knows, maybe Feeley can’t find another open target even with more time and we win the play.
rufio - August 25, 2010
at the end of the day there is a 5 yard chuck zone in the nfl and you should take advantage of it… yes i understand that mcdonald is a smaller defender and may not be able to knock him far off of his route but in a details oriented league like the nfl you have to use everything that you can to gain an advantage. Even at the college level i played d-line but i can’t tell you how many laps i saw incoming line backers and db’s run for letting a reciever cross their face without putting their hands on them.
tytryon biggums - August 25, 2010
p.s. wonderful breakdown i look foreward to more
tytryon biggums - August 25, 2010
"no promises while i am in school"
Rufio, I hope your schooling is dealing with offensive coordinator studies! very good breakdown of the play. I was yelling at my wife that they were going to throw it to the TE cause of the mismatch jackson split out exploited. I really thought the Browns were simply going to burn a timeout and re-set the ‘d’. i am a big coach ryan fan because his players seemed to give all they had last year with less than subpar talent on the field. we couldn’t keep up play to play but, they were busting their collective 3rd team and practice squad asses and i loved that about them. i was surprised he didn’t call the timeout thinking to himself that we just escaped a glaringly bad situation but, he’s not going to see every mis-match. as long as he sees alot more of them in the regular season. a reminder to us fans, the coaches are also in preseason form getting their recognition down to better timing as well! i think we’ll see a much more competitive browns team this year that may not be a play-off contender but, will be a pain in the ass team for everyone to play because we can’t be overlooked anymore. I’ll take that as long as the following season we become a play-off contender worrying about pain in the ass teams! go browns! will be interesting to watch suh tonight but, i may miss because of my own kids football game…hey he got moved to starting center AND starting nose tackle after his game last week…hard work always wins in the end!
SeanPaul - August 28, 2010
You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Dawgs By Nature to post a comment.