Sponsored Post: This post is presented by Sprint. Bringing you the first wireless 4G network from a national carrier. Only on the Now Network.
This is the second edition of this series that we'll be doing over the next few months, highlighting game-changing moves that have occurred since the end of last season. The first one was about keeping KR Joshua Cribbs a member of the Browns. This week, considering the events from the draft, it's only fair that we take a look at how it'll act as a game-changer this season.
Game-Changing Offseason Move #2: Back to Back, Joe Haden and T.J. Ward
The Cleveland Browns didn't quite get S Eric Berry in the draft like most fans wanted, but that didn't stop Mike Holmgren and company from addressing the holes in the secondary as soon as possible. With the team's first two picks of the draft, the Browns went with cornerback Joe Haden and safety T.J. Ward.

I won't get into the specifics of each individual player's abilities -- that'll be coming throughout the next week or so when we take a closer look at each of our draft picks. The game-changing move is that the organization has made a huge commitment to improving the secondary, which has ranked near the bottom of the league off-and-on for a few years now.
Heading into the draft, the Browns had three starters in the secondary penciled in. Eric Wright and Sheldon Brown were the cornerbacks, and Abram Elam would be a safety. With Brodney Pool departing in the offseason to the New York Jets, things would have been gloomy if Mike Adams was named our new starting safety. That's why the hype was so high on Berry, but since we did not get him, I think it's also why the Browns somewhat reached to grab Ward in the second round. Ward's coverage skills are in question, but from the highlight reels I have seen the kid certainly knows how to deliver a hit, and the Browns need people who are the anti-Brandon McDonald when it comes to tackling. I'm still not sold on Elam yet as a premiere safety, but it'll be fun to see how the tandem of Elam and Ward works out this season.
It gets a little fuzzier when you think about where Haden fits into the equation then, since he was the team's first-round pick. I am thrilled that for the first time in years, the Browns appear to be in good shape at the nickel back position. We don't have to worry about a Ralph Brown, Hank Poteat, or Mike Adams getting beat in the slot. And although I appreciated his double duty last season, we don't have to worry as much about throwing a guy like Mike Furrey in on defense, because we have legitimate depth. Being three-deep at cornerback should also help against a team like the Baltimore Ravens this year, who improved their receiving corp. We have the manpower, and hopefully the talent, to match up with Anquan Boldin, Derrick Mason, Mark Clayton, and Donte Stallworth.
People have been quick to throw McDonald under the bus (me being one of those people), but there's nothing wrong with keeping him on as the fourth defensive back. He might not be a starter, but you don't need the guys that far down on your depth chart to be a starter.
In conclusion, with two important positions filled in the secondary from the draft, how could you not consider them game-changing offseason moves?
0 recs | 69 comments
BTW, my apologies for the lack of posting. I needed a brief two-three day intermission there but am back on duty now.
Chris Pokorny - April 29, 2010
Yeah right, we’re on to you Chris. We know you are only going to post now when Sprint pays you.
Villeslgr - April 30, 2010
I guess I shouldn’t tell Chris that I refuse to pay that outrageous Sprint cancellation fee when I switched to Verizon a few years back. They’re not getting that $280.
Brownie's Year - April 30, 2010
TMobile charged me $500 to cancel three lines because their G1’s were piles of dook.
Lost me, a 8 year customer, over it.
I now have Sprint and couldn’t be happier.
Bernie19Kosar - April 30, 2010
I’ve been a Sprint customer for as long as I’ve owned a cell phone and I’ve always been happy with them.
Buckeye Brad - April 30, 2010
Their service never seems that good in WV, so we have always had AT&T. gotta watch your bills, but the service is good. A-holes try and sneak charges in on ya.
Kimble_79 - April 30, 2010
I’ll weigh in on this i guess. Verizon has always done a great job for me. I never, and i mean never lose service. except for one spot near carrollton…
notthatnoise - April 30, 2010
Yeah, Verizon is real good with that.
I kept hearing an echo of myself with Sprint (had 3 phones under them). ZERO problems with Verizon.
Brownie's Year - April 30, 2010
Verizon has service everywhere.
But there is zero cell phone reception in the basement of our art building (where my office is). On any network. That place is a dungeon.
rufio - April 30, 2010
I’ve never owned a cell phone. I doubt I ever will.
golanbatrac - April 30, 2010
For a long time I might have said the same, but SMS rules. Short unobtrusive messages anytime, anywhere.
RelapsingDawgCatcher - May 1, 2010
My father thinks it’s blasphemy.
SpecialBrownie - May 1, 2010
I give you props for this! I don’t like mine much. Gets annoying at times.
Kimble_79 - May 2, 2010
I call bullshit on this. You come to Mason County, WV or the southern part of Wood County. I gaar-an-tee you won’t find verizon service. AT&T is the bomb as far as service goes in WV. Nothing against verizon, loved them while had them living in Canton, OH.
Kimble_79 - May 2, 2010
My aunt lives in Moundsville, I often drove through WVA en route to tournaments in the South, and I never experienced problems on the roads or in the town. I do not claim to have been everywhere using my cellphone, that was clearly hyperbole. Verizon does work well in the mountains here in CO.
rufio - May 3, 2010
out of curiosity, what kind of tournament?
notthatnoise - May 3, 2010
Ultimate. I apologize if there is bad music in that video, I didn’t listen to it.
rufio - May 3, 2010
hmmm, stop me if this is too personal, but where do/did you go to college, and if you graduated already how long ago?
notthatnoise - May 4, 2010
Ohio State, graduated a few years ago.
rufio - May 5, 2010
too long ago to know a kid named Sean Roach?
notthatnoise - May 5, 2010
You mean there are pockets of West Virginia where modern amenities aren’t available? Nonsense.
danvail - May 3, 2010
lol…and unfortunately I had to live in those pockets as that’s where my wife’s family is from for four LONG years.
Kimble_79 - May 3, 2010
Looking back though. I would love to have had berry but I am in a way a little glad we didn’t reach for Earl Thomas. I like him, but not as much as some (especially Mike mayock). Even though we had Sheldon brown, I still felt it would be a good Idea to take a CB in the first 2-3 rounds. Imagine if Brown has to match up against a speed demon like Mike Wallace?
I am slightly disappointed we didn’t get berry but I think Haden+Ward<Thomas+Amari Speivey (the CB I had highest when we picked in the 2nd). There were a lot of good safeties left in the 2nd but all the good CBs got taken almost in a row.
bross09 - April 30, 2010
I still don’t think Thomas is anything special.
Bernie19Kosar - April 30, 2010
I think it’s very rare to find a safety that’s special enough to be a good value as a first round pick. I can only think of 3 in the league right now: Reed, Polamalu, and Sanders. Bob Sanders has serious injury issues though so I might even say there’s only 2 safeties in the league worth a first round pick, let alone a top 10 pick.
Earl Thomas didn’t show signs of being THAT good. Eric Berry does look the part but we’ll have to see what he does on the field. Either way, there’s a reason why safeties are paid less than corners: CB is a premier position with a huge impact on the game and S isn’t quite as important.
(Sorry fellow Bucks fans, but Donte Whitner isn’t worth a 1st rounder either and he was a colossal reach at #8 overall.)
Bumblyjack - April 30, 2010
Eric Berry has looked the part on the football field for 2-3 years. Whitner was a huge reach. But that isn’t his fault.
rufio - April 30, 2010
bross09 - April 30, 2010
I am pretty low on Speivey.
My guess is that we have our DBs follow the WRs around the field based on matchups, close to 100% of the time, regardless of coverage.
Our CBs are all a little different. Wright is very fast and pretty ridiculously fluid. Brown is a little bigger and more physical, but isn’t as fast over 30+yards. Haden is probably between the two in both areas if I had to guess.
So hopefully Brown would match up on Ward, Wright could take Wallace, etc. I might put Brown on Boldin, while Wright could probably match up with Chad.
I am just thankful we won’t have 5’9"-on-a-good-day-right-after-he-woke-up Terry Cousin on 6’6" Plaxico anymore, regardless of what we do.
rufio - April 30, 2010
agreed…especially with terry cousin.
Everyone has their own opinions of prospects. my point really is, if we went after a CB in the 2nd or 3rd the pickings would be thin. In retrospect, I think it would look very shrewd in a few years if we come up with a good CB and S in this draft. there were good safeties to be found in many rounds.
bross09 - April 30, 2010
SpecialBrownie - April 30, 2010
Burn.
Andrew Tolliver - April 30, 2010
Chris Pokorny - April 30, 2010 via mobile
You aren’t the Sell Out… SBN is.
SpecialBrownie - April 30, 2010
danvail - April 30, 2010
Best Simpsons line ever.
Brownie's Year - May 1, 2010
That line makes me laugh every time I hear it.
danvail - May 3, 2010
LMAO!!! That was great!
Kimble_79 - May 2, 2010
McDonald is a decent db, he was just a huge liability on run support so being able to move him to dime packages is a big plus.
HenryDawg - April 30, 2010 via mobile
Absolutely right on the mark, Chris.
Let’s not forget about Larry Asante. I feel he will be at least as good as Elam has shown, THIS YEAR!
I predict ( at least HOPE ) that that will be the case.
The National Football Post, one of the best at breaking down drafts, believe the Browns had the best draft of all of the NFL teams.
They also had Ward and Asante rated the #2 and #3 safeties, respectively, prior to the draft.
Let’s all pray that they are right!
Because if they are, the idea of Wright /Haden at the corners and Ward/ Asante at the safeties with Brown, McDonald, Elam and Adams as back ups has the potential to be better than the Original Dawgs!
theotherJimBrown - April 30, 2010
Looks good considering what Ryan’s scheme will probably ask our secondary to do; that’s have the CBs in a lot of man coverage and expect the safeties to be dishing out plenty across the middle (Duerson/ Fencik, Hopkins and I think even Andre Waters was a Ryan snr safety?).
In this scheme you need to spend more value on your CBs than on your safeties. Though I would have been intrigued to see what mays would loook like in that scheme too; there’s your crucial fourth linebacker in the (4~3) fortysix D
LondonBrown - May 1, 2010
I am betting Ryan could adjust his defense to having an elite safety on the roster. I bet he would love the new possibilities.
The 46 has more in common with the 3-4 than the 4-3 in my opinion.
rufio - May 1, 2010
I think any half decent DC could get something out of Berry! But lacking that option I really think our 1~2 of Haden & Ward would be better than a 1~2 of say Thomas & CB AN Other.
The classic bears undershift 4 involved both OLBs (Wilson & Marshall) looping to the weakside leaving Duerson pretty exposed at SS. Takes a class act to do that, but Ward probably does have the skills…. or will that be Elam there?
LondonBrown - May 2, 2010
I have written here about the 46, thank you. The SS in the 46 bear usually plays like another ILB.
rufio - May 3, 2010
Oops. I might be guilty of quoting your own article back at you then!
Although I followed the Bears for my first season I never really appreciated the complexities of the 46. When you haven’t grown up with a sport it takes a while to get into it. Stiull your article went a long way to explaining the whole system.
LondonBrown - May 3, 2010
the problem is, they don’t have a half decent DC in KC, they have Romeo.
bross09 - May 3, 2010
Romeo is a very good Defensive Coordinator.
Just a questionable coach.
Bernie19Kosar - May 3, 2010
Just a questionable terrible coach.
danvail - May 3, 2010
Strike fail.
danvail - May 3, 2010
yeah…he was a solid good DC in New England, but when he came to the browns he couldn’t make something out of nothing like Rob Ryan did last year…not that our D was great, but we created more pressure on the QB than with Romeo and I would say used the pieces we had better than when romeo was here.
bross09 - May 3, 2010
Hey, Chris. I’m guessing that moving Ray Ventrone to WR was less of an attempt to upgrade the secondary and more of a clerical error in the roster on the DBN front page. N’est-ce pas?
JustBob - May 1, 2010
I have no control over the roster page, that comes from out stats provider. But Ventrone was considered a WR/S when we signed him.
Chris Pokorny - May 2, 2010
No love for Sorenson?
TheRealSlimShady - May 2, 2010
Who?
Brownie's Year - May 2, 2010
Nick Sorenson.
golanbatrac - May 2, 2010
Who?
Brownie's Year - May 2, 2010
Nick Sorenson.
golanbatrac - May 2, 2010
Who?
Dawg Nuts - May 2, 2010
Orange ya glad I didn’t say banana?
golanbatrac - May 2, 2010
Nick Sorensen (and wife)
Roger Dorn - May 2, 2010
Who?
SpecialBrownie - May 2, 2010
Nick Sorenson (and wife)
Dawg Nuts - May 2, 2010
Who’s that chick?
Brownie's Year - May 2, 2010
(and wife)
Dawg Nuts - May 2, 2010
Wait, I’m confused. Huh?
Brownie's Year - May 2, 2010
Who’s that guy next to Nick Sorenson’s wife?
Buckeye Brad - May 2, 2010
Nick Sorenson.
golanbatrac - May 2, 2010
I know him. He’s a sic TE.
Brownie's Year - May 3, 2010
who cares?
notthatnoise - May 3, 2010
Great answer.
Buckeye Brad - May 3, 2010
You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Dawgs By Nature to post a comment.