SB Nation - Login for mobile commenting

Dawgs By Nature

Ed Reed's Pair of Picks Sends Browns to 20-10 Loss; Sets Up Meaningful Pittsburgh Game

CLEVELAND - DECEMBER 26:  Safety Chris Carr #25 of the Baltimore Ravens jumps for the ball as safety Ed Reed #20 looks on with wide receiver Chansi Stuckey #83 of the Cleveland Browns at Cleveland Browns Stadium on December 26 2010 in Cleveland Ohio.  (Photo by Matt Sullivan/Getty Images)

Matt Sullivan - Getty Images

over 1 year ago: CLEVELAND - DECEMBER 26: Safety Chris Carr #25 of the Baltimore Ravens jumps for the ball as safety Ed Reed #20 looks on with wide receiver Chansi Stuckey #83 of the Cleveland Browns at Cleveland Browns Stadium on December 26 2010 in Cleveland Ohio. (Photo by Matt Sullivan/Getty Images)

BALTIMORE RAVENS (11-4) GAME #15 CLEVELAND BROWNS (5-10)
VS.
20 10


By virtue of the Cleveland Browns losing to the Baltimore Ravens, there will be a ton at stake for the Pittsburgh Steelers when they come to Cleveland Browns Stadium this Sunday. Pittsburgh currently holds the No. 2 seed and a first-round bye. If Pittsburgh loses to Cleveland and Baltimore beats Cincinnati, the Steelers would all of a sudden drop to the sixth seed*, meaning they would not have a single home playoff game. That would be a crushing blow to the Steelers. A win over the Steelers doesn't make our loss to the Ravens forgiven or anything, but it's something to get you hyped for this week's game.

Let's get to the review of the Ravens game, starting with the goats and then the game balls.

*The scenario also requires that the Jets beat the Bills.

Star-divide

WEEK 16 - BALTIMORE RAVENS VS. CLEVELAND BROWNS (COMPLETE GAME REVIEW)

Goats of the Game:

  • Colt McCoy: When McCoy started 8-of-10 with 2 interceptions in the first half, I thought all of his completions were thrown right on the money and the decisions were made nice and quick. On the first interception, the pass needs to be thrown more to the outside. While I like the fact that we took a shot deep there, Cleveland had been moving the ball well down the field, and unless we saw something on tape where it wouldn't be a jump ball type of situation, the decision seems a bit questionable.
     
    On McCoy's second and third interceptions, Ed Reed showed why he's one of the elite safeties in the league and a master at baiting opposing quarterbacks into thinking their receiver is open. The throws themselves weren't the greatest, but I have to wonder how many other safeties would have been in position to make those plays. Assuming McCoy is under center next season, hopefully he understands that it's important to pay extra attention to what Reed is doing.
     
    The most disappointing thing for me regarding McCoy's day was his inaccuracy in the second half though. For the first time this season, several of his short-range passes were off the mark, which stalled Cleveland's offense in the second half.
     
  • Sheldon Brown: It wasn't quite the "Anquan Boldin burns Eric Wright" type of day for Brown, but despite the veterans coverage in the vicinity of Derrick Mason, he had trouble preventing the Baltimore receiver from making a couple of key catches, including a 22-yard touchdown in which Brown was holding the hell out of Mason in the end zone. The throw by Joe Flacco to T.J. Houshmandzadeh early in the game was just a nice pass.
     
  • Mohamed Massaquoi: There is no way a team can survive when they turn the ball over four times against the Baltimore Ravens, and Massaquoi was involved in all four of the Browns' turnovers. He was targeted on all three interceptions. I don't question that he "gave up" on his routes or anything on those plays, but the fact that he couldn't catch any of those passes or at least have a hand in breaking up the passes shows how behind he is as a receiver when you look at other players around the league. I also believe that Massaquoi's fumble after the Browns were leading 7-3 was the definitive turning point of the game, as it allowed the Ravens to claim a lead they would never surrender.

Awarding the Game Balls:

  • Joe Haden: What can you say? He was assigned to Anquan Boldin most of the game, and Boldin's final line was 2 catches for 15 yards. Haden intercepted Joe Flacco, came up to sack Flacco near the sideline (the ball came loose in the process for a forced fumble, but went out of bounds), and continued showing that he has the subtleties of a cornerback mastered when he barely grabbed hold of a Baltimore receiver on his route to the end zone.

General Thoughts:

  1. Unnecessary Shot by Vickers: I'm glad to see that Lawrence Vickers was pumped up to face the Baltimore Ravens. As I reviewed Massaquoi's fumble though, you can see Vickers diving to the ground to take a shot at a Baltimore defender on the ground as the football is being stripped from Massaquoi. What is the upside of doing that? If the play had been blown dead due to forward progress being stopped, I think Vickers gets flagged 15 yards for a late hit. If Vickers doesn't take the shot, he could have easily forced the ball out of bounds.
     
  2. Hillis Hurt Early: I didn't anticipate a big game from Peyton Hillis, and he finished with just 12 carries for 35 yards. His longest rush of the game went for just 7 yards, although I thought there were several nice cutback runs the Browns were running early on that needed just one extra blocker to spring Hillis free. Hillis was hurt early on when Ed Reed had a free shot square in Hillis' back as he was going to the ground. It looked painful even before they showed Hillis start wincing on the sideline.
     
  3. Mike Bell Steps it Up: Props to backup Mike Bell for providing a little bit of a spark with Hillis hurt. He ran 7 times for 27 yards, and added 2 catches for 48 yards. This was something I mentioned earlier this season -- fooling defenses by throwing the ball to a guy like Bell (or Vickers) when a defense doesn't expect them to catch the ball. That's the reason Hillis was effective as a receiver earlier this season before teams started keying in on him. Bell might see more action against Pittsburgh due to Hillis' injury.
     
  4. Playcalling Approved: Despite the fact that the Browns only put ten points on the board, I didn't have a lot of beef with the offensive playcalling this week. Given what I expected to be Baltimore's strategy on defense, I think a fair distribution of runs and passes were used, and Cleveland clearly tried to work some counters in. We also brought Seneca Wallace and/or Joshua Cribbs into the game three times, and each time he plays resulted in a touchdown, first down, and first down.
     
  5. A Little More Comfortable?: It's tough to say whether Joshua Cribbs sucked it up and absorbed more pain on his kick and punt returns, or if he was feeling a little bit better with his cuts. Although he didn't break a big one, I saw him attempt a few small cuts and moves that I hadn't seen him try since his injury over a month ago. He finished the game averaging 25.2 yards per return on five tries, including a 37-yard return.
     
  6. First Half Clock Situation: One of the big discussions after this week's game was the supposed mismanagement of the clock by Eric Mangini and company at the end of the first half. Here's what I think: after the big 28-yard gain to start the 2-minute warning, the Browns had the right idea: we're in field goal range, so we can take a little bit of time off to prevent Baltimore from getting the ball back and putting a quick drive together.
     
    Where the Browns went wrong was that they took way too much time off considering they had three timeouts under their belt. Being 23 yards away from the end zone still against a tough defense, there is no way you allow the clock to run down from 1:16 to 31 seconds. A timeout should have been called between 50 seconds and a minute. By taking it down to 31 seconds, Cleveland basically gave themselves 3 plays instead of maybe 6 plays and a chance to feel like moving the chains one more time still made sense.
     
  7. Calling the Onside Kick: Before the onside kick happened, I called it (check the game thread). I'm a firm believer in having faith in your special teams if you see something on tape. Phil Dawson has to make sure the ball goes at least ten yards in that situation though. In terms of strategy, it ended up being a blow because Baltimore quickly scored a touchdown off of it. I think the coaching staff saw that our defense had been good at holding opposing teams to field goals and saw the downside as only going down 16-10 at that point, something that might have happened anyway on a kickoff. Maybe the onside kick seemed desperate to others, but Baltimore did bail -- Cleveland just didn't execute.
     
  8. Williams Blows Opportunity: After the Browns went down 20-10 at the start of the third quarter, they needed a quick strike from their offense to get back in the game. Cleveland started good with a decent kick return and a first down to get near mid-field. On 2nd-and-6, McCoy targeted receiver Demetrius Williams for the first time this season. The ball was right on Williams who had it, but then dropped it. The play looked like it would've gone for a first down.
     
    Who knows how the game changes if Williams holds on to that catch, which would have put the Browns into Ravens territory. Even if you come away with just a field goal, it would've been huge to be within one possession again.
     
  9. Robiskie Breaking Out: It took long enough for Brian Robiskie to start catching touchdowns at the NFL level, didn't it? Earlier this year, I said that I thought Robiskie seemed to be our best receiver at getting open on deep routes, and the past two weeks it seems that might be the case. Robiskie made a terrific adjustment to Massaquoi's trick touchdown pass, and later on Robiskie caught a pass for 42 yards. The pass was called back due to offensive pass interference, a call that I think was complete bull. I was even more furious to see several other NFL games after our game on Sunday in which the receivers did much worse and either no flag was thrown or the defender was flagged.
     
  10. Beyond the Marker: The Browns' receivers, including Chansi Stuckey, ran their routes beyond the third-down marker against Baltimore. At least that is something the Browns corrected offensively. The Browns finished the day 7-of-11 on third down, a percentage I'll take any day of the week.
     
  11. Nice Read on the Screen: Props to linebacker David Bowens for sniffing out a wide receiver screen pass immediately and stopping the play for a loss. The Browns were destroyed on a wide receiver screen last week at Cincinnati.
     
  12. Lack of Depth: Our lack of depth at linebacker and on the defensive line has hurt the Browns from getting a pass rush without bringing extra players (see the Saints game earlier this season) and stopping the run. Travis Ivey saw more snaps than I expected, which leads me to believe that Shaun Rogers barely saw the field. I could be wrong, but it's difficult to gauge just how much Rogers is being played.
     
  13. Ward Stays Home on Fleaflicker: I don't recall the Browns being burned by a fleaflicker in several years now. I'm surprised Joe Flacco still threw the deep pass to Donte Stallworth too, since two defenders were right there. Stallworth did a nice job playing the defender and preventing T.J. Ward from coming away with an interception.
     
  14. Committing the Extra Safety: I thought Rob Ryan put some defensive backs up to the line when a run was anticipated, preventing Ray Rice from gashing the Browns like Cedric Benson did a week ago. I was glad to see that adjustment.
     
  15. Special Teams Tackles: The Browns only had two special teams tackles on Sunday -- one from Sabby Piscitelli, and the other from Titus Brown.
     
  16. The Trick Play: Let's go back to the offensive highlight of the game for Cleveland, a trick play pass thrown by Mohamed Massaquoi. The snap went to Seneca Wallace, who handed it to Peyton Hillis, who pitched it to Massaquoi. Brian Robiskie streaked down the right sideline, while Ben Watson went down the left sideline. Tight end Alex Smith ended up shifting over to be Massaquoi's "fullback" for the pass. Massaquoi threw it to the end zone for Robiskie, but if you look at the replay, Wallace was completely uncovered in the flat. If Massaquoi had lofted the ball to him instead, I imagine Wallace would've been able to at least run to the 10 or 5-yard line before a defender even had a crack at hitting him.
     
  17. Brownies: I loved the commentating by Ian Eagle and Dan Fouts during the game, and we're going to get them this week against the Steelers again...I wish we could've seen the Vikings/Eagles snowfest on Sunday, but it'll also be kind of cool to see an extra day of football and Michael Vick today...NBC made the right decision to flex the Seahawks vs. Rams game for Week 17.

Next up, the Browns finish their season against the Steelers. It's hard to believe we might finish with the same number of wins as we did last season. Hopefully the team executes on all cylinders to stun the Steelers and drop them to the sixth seed in the AFC, reducing their chances at reaching another Super Bowl.

0 recs  |  64 comments

Comments

Well, beating the Steelers any time(especially to knock them out of a first round bye) is something to look forward to after another sub .500 season anyways.

I haven’t bothered to look up the rule – but maybe someone knows the answer to this off the top of thier head. On the onside kick – Haden stood and watched the ball roll out of bounds, giving posession to the Ravens deep in our territory. If he would have jumped on the ball – would that not have been a penalty for touching the ball before 10yds. and a re-kick? I don’t want to criticize Haden after all his great play, but he may have saves 20 or 30 yards of position. Is this rule different in college? I was at the game so if this was discussed in the game thread, I was absent.

I think that rule used to exist, but I think the NFL fixed it to prevent giving the kicking team an advantage.

If Quinn could do it last year, then McCoy can too?

at first I thought the same thing about Vickers, but after watching the replay it does look like he was actually going for the ball but took a bad angle – it did however give me flashbacks to Robo’s attempt on Stuckey’s fumble in the Jets game. Makes me wonder if they are coached to block other potential recoverers while at the same time going after the ball.

Slow Joe is awesome

7. I really liked the onside kick call too, despite the lack of execution.

Turnovers killed us in this game.
McCoy rightfully put the blame on his own shoulders in his presser.

Aside from the turnovers, one thing that really bothers me is the clock management at the end of the first half as you mention in #6. To start at mid-field with 2:00 left in the half sitting on three timeouts, and not take your first timeout until you’re down to :17 seconds remaining is appalling.
There has been lots of discussion lately about Mangini (if he will or should keep his HC job). I’ve stated recently that I’d like to see him back next year (with a new OC). But just because I support him coming back next year doesn’t mean he shouldn’t be roundly criticized for what are clearly some glaring flaws in his decision making at times when our offense is on the field. Hopefully Holmgren has taken him to task on this.
I’d also go a step further with the criticism, because I think his ‘strategy’ with the clock in that series is indicative of his tendency to ‘play not to lose’ instead of taking a more aggressive approach. IMHO this has been a drag on our offensive production as evidenced with some of our red zone offensive series in other games.

Great video…every time I listen to Colt McCoy talk, I’m more impressed with him.

I guess my football acumen isn’t quite where it needs to be—I don’t really get the issue people have with the clock management. I just wanted some points on the board, and to not give the Ravens a shot at retaliating. Obviously, most football observers didn’t like the execution—even the TV commentator was “WTF”-ing; I just need someone to explain what was wrong about it.

Chris says in his (awesome, as usual) breakdown above, “Cleveland basically gave themselves 3 plays instead of maybe 6 plays and a chance to feel like moving the chains one more time still made sense.”

Converting a 1st down in a tightened field against a great defense is no guarantee. Don’t we risk a three-and-out, field goal, and BAL with ~1 minute left to make something happen?

I agree on the McCoy’s interviews – kid’s got a really good head on his shoulders.

I wouldn’t have cared if we had left Baltimore 30 seconds on the clock if it meant we could have scored a touchdown on that drive. Seems to me winning teams play to win, putting the ball in the end zone as priority #1 and have confidence in their defense to stop a team from scoring after leaving them with only 30 seconds on the clock. Mangini has a tendency to play scared in my opinion. His 1st priority on that drive was to run the clock down – not to score a touchdown. IMHO with that kind of thinking you’re playing scared and suppressing the output of your offense.
I guarantee you if the Saints, Steelers, or Patriots were in that position you would have seen those timeouts used however necessary in order to get the ball into the end zone.

Sorry to jump in, but Mangini does not have the offensive squads of the Steelers, Saints and Patriots. And it’s not like the offense had made him any more confident in what it would accomplish. On top of that Mangini planned for the on-side kick and getting the ball again to start the 2nd half. I think he can justifiably argue that he was playing for the win.

It’s worthy of being second-guessed, but even Belichick gets second-guessed – remember the Colts game when he went for it on 4th down within his territory?

Its a valid point about the strength of their offensive squads. But the Browns were moving the ball. They had momentum. Bottom line I think if we use those timeouts it gives us a much better chance to get in the end zone – strong offensive personnel or not.
The onside kick – also a good point. It is puzzling – i.e. being so conservative (‘playing not to lose’ as I’ve described it), then on the other hand going for the on-side kick (where you are MUCH more likely to give the Ravens a scoring opportunity than kicking off to them with 30 seconds left). Its baffling.

We were moving the ball but we had also turned it over quite a bit as well. Again I dont think the last drive at the end of the half was playing conservative as much as it was playing smart. You take points and then attempt to get the ball back after the half and take the lead.

“Where the Browns went wrong was that they took way too much time off considering they had three timeouts under their belt. Being 23 yards away from the end zone still against a tough defense, there is no way you allow the clock to run down from 1:16 to 31 seconds” … “Cleveland basically gave themselves 3 plays instead of maybe 6 plays”

I absolutely agree with Chris’s assessment on this.
In my opinion our failure to use our timeouts appropriately and manage the clock in a way that would would have much more likely put us in a position to score a touchdown was inexcusable.

Saying we don’t have the offenses of those other teams is a horrible excuse. Have we been competitive with the best teams in the league or not? At least give the guys a chance to make some plays. Handcuffing them because you don’t think they have enough talent is ridiculous, loser mentality

Perhaps the strategy was more of an indictment against Daboll: Mangini just didn’t trust his decisions at a high leverage point in the game. Taking the discussion a step further, Mangini probably plans to fire Daboll at the end of the season; and outside of gross negligence (see Kokinis last year) Mangini believes it is better to avoid big changes during the season?

We have seen far better examples of losing attitudes by head coaches this season. And I certainly feel better that Mangini had a thoughtful reason for running down the clock (we can debate the merits of the reason). But compared to the thoughtless decisions all of the previous coaches made, this is small potatoes.

Actually, I have been pretty impressed with Daboll’s play calling the last couple of games. He’s using a good mix of pass and run with a splash of crazy stuff. I still think their base offensive sets are highly predicatable and they don’t create mismatches but I wonder if he, like Mangini has gotten better this year form last needs more experience (well they both need more experience – I mean, will experience be enough?)

Handcuffing them because you don’t think they have enough talent is ridiculous, loser mentality

I’d say it’s the other way around. should we have let Jake Delhomme and Seneca Wallace throw the ball around like Peyton Manning because not doing so is a “loser mentality?” No. You play to your talent, and account for your strengths and weaknesses.

I agree with what you just said, but its not really relative to what I was saying. In fact, if anything, with less talent and experience, you should give them even more time to try and find the end zone or get a first down. You can’t expect Colt to be able to manage the offense to pin point accuracy like Brady or Manning with only a few seconds. Leave him some wiggle room for a mistake and in that situation you would still leave 20- 30 secs. max. I would trust my STs and Defense in that situation more than I would trying to rush my young offense into possibly making a mistake (which it looked like Colt was really wary of)

you should give them even more time to try and find the end zone or get a first down

Exactly.
Instead we blew almost a full minute running down the clock in fear of the dreaded Ravens offense possibly using that 30 seconds to score on us – leaving our offense little or no ‘wiggle room’ as you aptly put it.

Ah-ha! I just went back and looked at the drive log; I did not realized the FG was kicked on 3rd down. I thought it was 4th down. Now I see what the all the hubbub is about. I guess that’s what happen when I combine babysitting with watching the game.

Yes. They ran out of time! They had no choice but to settle for a field goal!
Ridiculous. With 2:00 left and three timeouts starting at mid-field, as Chris says they should have been able to get at least two or three more plays off, if the timeouts had been used correctly. Instead they call their first timeout :17 seconds left in the half! I can’t believe anyone would think this is ‘playing smart’.

Yes. They ran out of time! They had no choice but to settle for a field goal!

:-) Yes, I got it now—like I said, I thought they kicked the FG on 4th down; hence, I thought they took 3 shots at the endzone, couldn’t convert, and took the 3 points. Now I realize they left at least one more chance unused. Consider me fully onboard with the clock-management criticizers.

We should have at least used all of our downs, and I think if you are worried about giving baltimore < 45 seconds to drive the field you aren’t confident enough in your own defense.

We had the right idea in terms of milking some of the clock to “take the last shot” but we didn’t need to milk it as much as we did.

this is why I am on the fence about Mangini…..his main job on game day is managing the game, and he consistently has troubles with this….I love the things he has done with this team….maybe he is just young yet and needs to learn, but it seems to have cost us dearly in some games.

When else has Mangini had troubles managing the game/clock?

(strictly speaking allsides said “managing the game” – not just managing the clock)

Rufio I’d like to hear your take on this, but It just seems to me that in a number of games we see one or more (or all) of the following:

1. Start off on the opening drive with a dynamic series and score.
2. The opponent makes adjustments.
3. Our offense is slowed down and fails to make effective counter-adjustments.
4. On one or two series our offense makes it deep into the opponent’s territory, then calls a very predictable, conservative series of plays, seemingly content to settle for a field goal.
5. Near the end of the game, we (finally) kick into a high gear (panic mode?) dynamic style of offense and move the ball downfield and score.

A couple of examples of #4 (for the sake of brevity I’ll just go back a couple of games…):

- at the end of the 3rd quarter at Cincinnati, with 1st down on the Cincinnati 14 yard line:
   - Hillis runs right center for 6 yards.
   - Hillis runs right center for 3 yards.
   - Hillis runs right center for no gain.
   - at the 5 yard line, we kick a field goal on 4th down

- on the first drive of the Buffalo game, with 1st down on the Bills 6 yard line:
   - Hillis up the middle for 4 yards.
   - Hillis runs right center for 1 yard.
   - Hillis runs right center for no gain (starting to sound familiar?)
   - at the 1 yard line, we kick a field goal on 4th down

In the Buffalo game, it was the first drive of the game. On the one yard line, in my opinion we should have tried to punch it into the end zone on 4th down.

IMO these examples illustrate predictable play calling and “playing not to lose”.
I’m pretty sure I could go back and dig up more examples but I’m assuming this is a familiar enough pattern that I don’t need to make this post excessively long.

Mangini....

I know one game should not make a decision, but if the Browns get humiliated at home (loss of more than 20 points) I think it is the end. I agree with BurntOrange, I wold like to see him back with a new OC and keeping Ryan, but I think if they make a change it will be a complete overall change again. I hate that thought.

Does anyone think it is fair to give Mangini only one year with Holmgren and Heckert? The draft they had was the best in decades and things are better. I say no it is not fair to give him only one draft,. If they were going to make that change they should have done it last year, but each day I think it is a higher probablilty. THOUGHTS?

It comes down to whether Holmgren wants to return to coaching. The number of head coaching positions open at the end of this season will be astronomical: at least 8 with potentially 15. With that amount of turnover, I think the “bird in the hand” analogy is fitting in this case.

In fact, the high degree of turnover might help to keep Rob Ryan in house as he would see it challenging to get a decent group of coordinators and assistants. Waiting a year or two would be his best overall career move.

Add to that the uncertainty of the lockout and maintaining the coaching staff seems to be better for near-term success.

he has had troubles with QBs this year, maybe a committment to MC for next year would help?

I wonder if I lean towards keeping him ONLY because I don’t want to rebuild again….it seems that when a coach comes in they always want to bring their players in so as to not give credit to the previous coach if they win.

as a friend tells me….you don’t go through a rebuild if you get the right coach.

You do if Crennel was the last coach.

(Love the new sig line, NCF.)

Can somebody tell me how in the God – damn hell Pouncey got into the Pro Bowl over Mack? Stupid.

Everything I have read says he is the best center in the AFC right now.

Whenever I watch him, I see absolutely nothing special. I’ve actually saw him get worked around. No way he’s near the best center right now.

that’s the good team bias. he’s the best lineman on a very good team, so people think he’s the best. He’s damn good, don’t get me wrong, maybe even better than Mack. But it certainly doesn’t hurt that everybody watches him play and we’re the only people that see Mack.

He is not better than Mack. I will admit he’s good but not better than Mack.

Mack has regressed this year. It may hurt to say it, but Pouncey had the better year

You don’t hate to say it, you love to say it. You can rub our (my) faces in Pouncey making it over Mack, but don’t lie to us.

And is therefore

going to the Probowl unless he’s busy in Dallas.

Don’t mean to be skeptical, but you are either really good at evaluating centers or just being biased.

I was an O – lineman afterall. I watched Pouncey when I watched the Steelers. I saw nothing better than what we already had in Mack. Also, the Pro Bowl is a popularity contest. When Collinsworth gushes over you on SNF, people remember. Not because of your play, but because a commentator kept gushing over you for nothing.

The majority of the decision comes from players and coaches. Fan vote is only a small amount.

Players and coaches watch SNF too.

I could see players, maybe, being swayed by watching SNF, although I doubt it, but you think a coach would take an announcer’s opinion over their own study of game film? What about players that went up against both guys, would they rely on who blocked them better or who Cris Collinsworth was fawning over?

Coaches don’t have time to watch film for their pro bowl votes. Unless they play the steelers they won’t have watched him like that.

A lot of it is reputation, even with the players and coaches.

They’ve come across these players before though is my point.

I disagree.

Once again, like many, thank you for agreeing.

I’m just repeating what I have seen, also from former players and offensive linemen.

I’m just repeating what I have seen, also from former players and offensive linemen.

You mean, just LeChalres Bentley right?

I don’t mean to deny that you’ve heard/read these things but I just don’t agree with them.

I am not saying I agree with them either.

the year mendenhall had helped and the fact that he is a beast of a run blocker.

This doesn’t necessarily belong on a Browns blog, but since it relates to football and is on my mind I’m going to post it anyways.

I cannot wait until Dana Holgorsen gets to WVU. Our offense last night was horrendous. I like how Oliver Luck (WVU Athletic Director) was blunt about replacing Bill Stewart. “We are in a weak conference and we are not generating points. Our defense is doing great, but we are lacking the offense.” Thank God. I’m tired of watching my mountaineers struggle to get first downs on a million bubble screens to WR’s.

Holgorsen is awesome. You guys are going to be a really good offense again soon.

Holgorsen runs a lot of fake bubble screens or bubble screen options so you will still see the WR screen, but defenses will have to stay at home or get burned on the fake screens.

We are all pretty excited for him to get here. Somewhat strange that he is going to be the OC next year, then head coach in 2012, but we are ready. I get so aggrevated with running a million bubble screens and then trying to run Devine up the gut. The guy is like 5’7", you can’t run him up the gut. I dont know who Clarke pissed off before the game, but I didn’t see him get one carry. Sorry, getting sidetracked, point is…yes, we are all excited and ready for him to take over.

You can run him up the gut. He just isn’t going to run anyone over.

A screen is a constraint play so there is probably some key where if X guy is in the box, you guys are/were going to the screen right away. Defenses probably figured this out and then disguised so they could feed you that key and then roll someone else in to stop the screen. Holgorsen will likely counter with something like this:

(h/t Smartfootball)
Which I am guessing doesn’t look familiar.

Nope, but I’m excited to see it in action. We are too small to try and pound Devine up the middle on the front line. We do much better on sweeps and passes to the flat where he can get in space.

A lot of your offense is based on zone runs like the zone read (or at least used to be). If Devine gets the ball on those plays, he has to cut it up the middle if that’s where the room is. The zone read, if given to the RB, is just the inside zone play.

If all you do is run Devine wide, that’s an easy key for the opposing D. You have to at least get it to him in the middle every once in a while to keep them honest. With the zone runs if they keep leaving the middle open, he’s got to keep running it there.

Though if I were your OC I would adopt some of the Inverted Veer option stuff to get Devine and #9 on the outside, making the QB be the inside option. It would also get your OL double teams on all of the linemen that you wouldn’t be optioning that would also be capable of making the tackle (they don’t have to massive either).

The problem is likely that he just doesn’t have a whole lot of room, though.

OT: A Browns Fan just raped the Price Is Right.

Drew Carey is no Bob Barker but come on…

You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Dawgs By Nature to post a comment.