
Matt Sullivan - Getty Images
over 1 year ago:
CLEVELAND - NOVEMBER 07: Head coach Eric Mangini of the Cleveland Browns leaves the field after their game against the New England Patriots at Cleveland Browns Stadium on November 7 2010 in Cleveland Ohio. (Photo by Matt Sullivan/Getty Images)
NEW ENGLAND PATRIOTS (6-2)
|
GAME #8 |
CLEVELAND BROWNS (3-5) |
 |
VS. |
 |
| 14 |
|
34 |
Eric Mangini defeated Bill Belichick this week, but the win has to mean so much more to him than just some simple "revenge" victory. His Cleveland Browns are playing perhaps the best football in the National Football League right now. The team's record might be 3-5 right now, but if this team keeps on rolling, look out.
Let's get to the review of this week's game, starting with the game ball...

WEEK 9 - NEW ENGLAND PATRIOTS VS. CLEVELAND BROWNS (COMPLETE GAME REVIEW)
Awarding the Game Ball:
- Peyton Hillis: I covered this in the game ball post already, so here is the cliff notes version: Hillis ran for a career high 184 yards on 29 carries and 2 touchdowns. His only blemish was a fumble in the first quarter, but that didn't stop Brian Daboll from ensuring he got the football. Hillis' hurdle, his second effort at the goal line on his first touchdown, a reception down the sideline, and his longest touchdown run of the season were all highlights.
Goats of the Game:
- Mike Bell: We haven't heard any updates on his hip injury, so I assume that means that he'll be fine. Bell needs to start running the ball a lot better when given opportunities. It is a bit absurd to have Hillis plow for an easy six yards on any given down, only to see Bell struggle to manage one yard. Looking at a few replays from the Patriots game, he seems to be taking way too slow to shift his hips after he receives the ball from McCoy. When you watch Hillis, he already recognizes the hole and is shifting his hips as he is receiving the ball from McCoy on the handoff.
General Thoughts:
- Underrated Play of the Game: In the fourth quarter, the Patriots were poised to make one last comeback attempt against the Browns. New England had just scored their second touchdown, making the score 27-14 with about 6:30 left to play.
On the Browns' next drive, Hillis was stuffed by Gerard Warren for a massive loss of five yards. Uh-oh. That set up a 2nd-and-15 situation. Against a lot of teams, that means the series would end up being a three-and-out. New England conceivably could have gotten the ball back with about five minutes to play.
Hillis wasn't about to have any of that. On 2nd-and-15, Hillis bursted by the Patriots' line for 15 yards and a first down. Ballgame. A few plays later, on his sixth straight carry of that drive, Hillis ran 35 yards for the final dagger touchdown.
- Trust in Receivers: There's no question that the offensive pass/run ratio was the most ideal you can get for the personnel Cleveland has. When they did throw the ball, it was nice to see Colt McCoy have faith in his wide receivers. Let's take a quick look at each of the receivers' production and/or looks.
- Massaquoi Off Playaction: Massaquoi was the team's leading receiver with 4 catches for 48 yards. Every time he was targeted, he caught the ball. I was fascinated when watching the replay of the Browns' first offensive play of the game. Off of playaction, the Browns only sent out two receivers. They had max protection -- eight guys were in there to block. McCoy and Massaquoi connected quickly for a 21 yard pickup. This is the type of passing we might see against the Jets this Sunday.
- Robiskie and Cribbs Hang On: There weren't many opportunities for Brian Robiskie and Joshua Cribbs, but they each had a memorable catch thanks to the mobility of Colt McCoy. On the pass to Cribbs, McCoy did a great job avoiding several pass rushers and rolled out to his right. He connected with Joshua Cribbs, who made a diving catch, after lining up slot left. The pass to Robiskie came on a rollout to the right again, this time after a miscommunication as to where Hillis was supposed to be lined up. McCoy made a perfect throw on the run, setting up a touchdown on the next play.
- Stuckey's Doesn't Convert: To start the second quarter, Chansi Stuckey had back-to-back catches -- one for 4 yards, and the other for 2 yards. The receptions fell short of a first down, and the Browns had to punt. It wasn't really Stuckey's fault, as the tackler was right there in position to make the play. Stuckey still got involved later on with his first touchdown of the season on a variation of the fumblerooski.
- Emergence of Abram Elam: I think it is safe to say that safety Abram Elam is in the best two-game stretch of his career. Against the Saints, he made a few plays in pass coverage. Against the Patriots, he had a huge strip on tight end Rob Gronkowski just before halftime. How different could the game have been if New England scores a touchdown there? On replay, I saw some other plays where Elam came across the field to make the finishing hit on BenJarcus Green-Ellis as well. He was Cleveland's leading tackler with eight.
- Utilizing Special Teamers on Defense: Even with the Browns up big, it was pretty surprising to see Blake Costanzo and Ray Ventrone in on defensive plays late in the game. Both players had noteworthy moments on defense -- prior to a Patriot fourth down, Costanzo appeared to fake an injury (I won't debate the validity, just stating how it "looked") to buy an injury timeout.
Then, on another fourth down play, Ventrone was guarding Gronkowski in the back of the end zone when the pass fell incomplete and out of bounds. Ventrone faceguarded the tight end as the ball came though, giving New England a first down at the one (and their second touchdown a couple players later).
- Brady to Gronkowski: Before the season, I was worried about the Browns' ability to cover tight ends. It really hasn't ended up being that big of a deal. Nonetheless, it was very odd to see how many times Tom Brady targeted his rookie tight end, Rob Gronkowski. I almost want to say..."thank you?" Brady targeted him 9 times. His top two wide receivers, Wes Welker and Deion Branch, were targeted a combined 10 times, mostly not until they were already being blown out.
- Hodges Mixes in a Bad One: Punter Reggie Hodges had three punts on Sunday, and two of them were great -- one at the 10-yard line, and one at the 2-yard line (to close out the game). His middle punt went 22 yards though, and was fair caught at the 21-yard line. I'll chalk it up to Hodges having his first bad hit in awhile due to the wind. Considering the Browns were punting from the 43, a short punt didn't harm them too much in the game of field position.
- Dominant Run Defense: In my game preview, I stated that I didn't like BenJarvus Green-Ellis' chances of success against Cleveland's run defense. Sure enough, Green-Ellis finished the game with 9 carries for 14 yards. Danny Woodhead gave the defense some trouble, but mostly on draw plays.
- Wildcat Usage: The volume of the Wildcat wasn't needed as much with Hillis doing so well himself. Still, it was good to see it mixed in, even if he only got two yards. The Browns need to keep with that formation, because Joshua Cribbs will break one sooner or later. He also drew the defense's attention big time on the fumblerooski.
- McCoy the Rest of the Way: I said this after the game, but I'll say it again -- all arguments for Jake Delhomme or Seneca Wallace starting can now be countered by the play of Colt McCoy against New England. Could he still struggle? Sure. But we have a running game to rely on, and a defense that is keeping us in games.
- The Touchdown Run: Who didn't go ape-nuts on Colt McCoy's touchdown run? From avoiding the rush, the running wide left, to seeing the crushing block from Joshua Cribbs, to the final dive at the pylon from McCoy, it was another great play in a great win for Cleveland.
- No Goat for Ventrone: Along with Mike Bell, I did consider making Ray Ventrone a goat for his pass interference in the fourth quarter. However, I couldn't forget the big fumble recovery he had when the Patriots fumbled their kickoff in the first quarter. How dumb was it for Gronkowski to call for a fair catch on a kickoff, and then let it go? This isn't a punt, guy. Thankfully when the Browns have guys like Marcus Benard returning a kick when teams kick away from Joshua Cribbs, we haven't had those issues.
- Special Teams Tackles: Leading the way on special teams was...well, no one. Five players had one tackle each, including T.J. Ward, Ray Ventrone, Mike Adams, Nick Sorensen, and Blake Costanzo. On field goals, Phil Dawson was money from 38 and 37 yards.
- Great Body Control: I remain impressed by the play of Evan Moore. Every time he is in the game, there is a positive play. Moore used his body and height for a great 19-yard yard catch near the goal line on the team's first touchdown drive. Moore caught the ball, kept his feet in, and then was about to still go forward for a score before another defender came over to knock him out of bounds. Maybe the Browns feel his success is the element of surprise, but I just envision Moore being used a lot more often in the gameplan. Maybe we'll try to pin him against the Jets' corners in one-on-one situations this week?
- Third Down Conversions: The Browns definitely outplayed the Patriots on third down on both sides of the ball. New England converted only 3/11 third downs, while Cleveland moved the chains on 7/13 third downs.
- Gutsy Call: Remember the years of Romeo Crennel, when the Browns would be losing a game in a losing season, and yet he would punt the ball in a fourth-and-short situation? The Browns are demonstrating a confident, winning playcall strategy now, as seen when they went for it on 4th-and-1 from their own 36 in the first quarter, up 10-0. The Browns lined up tight, and then everyone audibled wide. The second a defensive end/linebacker decided to shift to cover the slot receiver, Alex Mack snapped the ball and McCoy sneaked it forward for an easy first down. Hillis fumbled on the next play, but it was a great call given the look New England presented.
- Brownies: It was fun to see guys like Joe Thomas chestbump Brian Daboll, who has started to redeem himself after a rough playcalling stretch to start off the season...how many deflected passes in the end zone for touchdowns will the Browns give up this year?...the goal line defense stopped Green-Ellis twice from the one, so the team's streak of only giving up one touchdown still stands.
Next up, the Browns take on the New York Jets. This game will be just as tough [heading into it] as the Patriots and Saints games were, if not tougher. There's only one difference now -- all of a sudden, the Cleveland Browns and Peyton Hillis are everyone's new favorite team and player in the NFL. How will Cleveland respond in the spotlight?
The Costanzo “fake” was brilliant. Painfully obvious, but brilliant.
Andrew Tolliver - November 9, 2010
I think the reason he only went for two yards on all his attempts is because he was running to the right each time. Why weren’t we running to the left? I don’t know if Daboll is this smart, but I think we were baiting them for the eventual trick play. Obviously Cribbs ran the fake to the right, just like the other attempts when he did have the ball.
SpecialBrownie - November 9, 2010
That works well with my theory that Colt was faking his “helmet problems” a few times in order to sell that he had to go to the sideline to ask the coaches what they had to run during Stuckey’s TD.
Btw, what’s Stuckey’s catch count at? I lost track.
BrownDawg1409 - November 9, 2010
I think you’ve won. I doubt B19K cares anymore. I think he understands he’s lost.
SpecialBrownie - November 9, 2010
23 so far.
Not looking good for me. I’m cool with it though. Stuckey has been a surprise.
Bernie19Kosar - November 9, 2010
I was being assailed by co workers who are cowboys fans today. One of them wanted to know if Peyton Hillis is really Larry Csonka’s love child. LMAO, no S#%t, thats what I really heard. After about 5 minutes of laughing I told him that it is possible but Peyton might smack him in the face if it’s said again. The kid plays like Larry used to play, and I dont mind all of those cowboys fans slobbering on the idea of becoming bandwagon Browns fans. Our team is winning over fans in Colt’s stomping grounds of North Texas. Keep it up!
J. W. - November 9, 2010
This wasn’t an onside, friend.
SpecialBrownie - November 9, 2010
I can’t tell how snarky you’re trying to be here. If it’s sarcasm, then ok, but you do realize that if he let the pop-up kickoff go then it is live and can be recovered like an onsides kick. Hence, really dumb not to catch the ball after signaling a fair catch.
doggrad87 - November 9, 2010
Piling on here, but “onside” has nothing to do with anything — once a kickoff goes 10 yards, it is a live ball that kicking team can recover. The receiving team does not need to touch it. That’s the key difference between a kick and a punt. A punt is not a live ball to the kicking team unless touched by the receiving team. It appears that you did not know that.
TheDriveStillHurts - November 9, 2010
Holy crap, does nobody f-ing watch South Park?
SpecialBrownie - November 9, 2010
I hate South Park.
StuckInPa - November 9, 2010
Not shocked.
SpecialBrownie - November 9, 2010
I’m with you.
golanbatrac - November 9, 2010
Last time I responded to that some one yelled at me because they thought I was getting shitty.
North Coast Flea - November 9, 2010
I see, obviously.
SpecialBrownie - November 9, 2010
I used to love South Park. But you have to realized, I’m talking South Park circa 1997-98. We used to go to a bar and 30-50 patrons would shut the place down in between commercials. No one was allowed to talk, order a beer, bother the bartenders in any way, shape or form. Everyone watched South Park and did nothing else. Good times 12-13 years ago and I was in my late twenties. If you’re referencing something fairly new, you need to add explanations. (I’m old)
doggrad87 - November 9, 2010
south park the last couple years is barely worth mentioning IMO. Supposedly there is only going to be 1-2 more seasons and it feels like they have kinda just said “oh, we are near the end, screw it”
bross09 - November 9, 2010
I disagree completely.
notthatnoise - November 9, 2010
Coon & Friends is one of the funniest god damn episodes I’ve ever seen. South Park is still just as awesome, it’s just lost it’s spotlight. It’s no longer trendy because Family Guy basically does the same thing now, etc. It’s awesome but it was only popular because at the time it was the only one doing what it does.
SpecialBrownie - November 9, 2010
I have not liked this season. thats just me. the concept of captain hindsight was funny, but it felt like it didn’t go anywhere. Plus. coon and friends felt like 2 episodes that should have been 1. The season is not “bad” but it doesn’t hold a candle IMO to the earlier episodes.
when was the last time they truly pushed boundaries? when was the last time they truly had an unforgettable show? I have not found an unforgettable episode at all so far in the 14th season. most seasons, I usually find 4-5 but even season 13 had only 3 truly unforgettable episodes (fish sticks, Margheritaville, and dances with smurfs).
Its still decently entertaining TV, but it cannot be compared to earlier seasons.
bross09 - November 9, 2010
They just had Al Queda crash airplanes into the cast of Jersey Shore.
That isn’t enough for you?
Bernie19Kosar - November 9, 2010
THEY F-ING PUT MOHAMMAD ON THE SHOW AFTER REAL LIFE DEATH THREATS.
SpecialBrownie - November 9, 2010
that was one of the few episodes I liked, but was that really “pushing the boundaries”?
that is nowhere near outrageous IMO as even the one with Satan’s “my super sweet 16” and that one isn’t even outrageous for previous seasons
bross09 - November 9, 2010
Your views of outrageous are severely skewed.
SpecialBrownie - November 9, 2010
really? considering how South Park used to be, the Al Quaida thing would generally be more the norm. now its the only example you can find in a season where south park is pushing the boundaries…and really, they have pushed the al quaida boundary so much and overused that one that in the sense of the actual reference, its really not pushing any significant boundaries. they have been there and farther with pushing the boundaries when it came to al quaida.
bross09 - November 10, 2010
the episode where everyone was bouncing around on giant testicles wasn’t pushing the boundaries?
notthatnoise - November 10, 2010
slightly, but I thought it was more stupid than outrageous personally.
bross09 - November 10, 2010
yes, you are wrong
Roger Dorn - November 10, 2010
no I am right.
see, this gets us nowhere.
bross09 - November 10, 2010
Saying something doesn’t make it so.
Roger Dorn - November 10, 2010
my point exactly. you are saying something, but that doesn’t make it so.
bross09 - November 10, 2010
I know
Roger Dorn - November 10, 2010
The social commentary and mocking of popular culture basically writes itself, (Matt and Trey manage to make entire episodes the previous weekend). They’ll never run out of material for that reason. The show could go on virtually forever, at least as long as people still watch television.
Simmsinns - November 9, 2010
Yes, or politicians continue to make huge fools of themselves.
I mean, they incorporated Chutulu, superheroes, Lebron James, and BP all in one relevant episode.
Those two are damn geniuses. They are also the reason Baseketball is my favorite movie.
SpecialBrownie - November 9, 2010
I wouldn’t go as far to call them geniuses, how ever I do find some of the episodes humorous. A lot of episodes fall flat for me though. There are a ton of die hards our there though so I don’t think South Park is going anywhere. The profit margin has to be massive.
Simmsinns - November 9, 2010
They could make a whole season just on Cartman and it would be a hit,
SpecialBrownie - November 9, 2010
I totally agree and I AM a die hard fan. Like I can admit as a die hard fan when the browns suck, I can admit when an episode of south park sucks.
bross09 - November 9, 2010
yes. the show could go on for ever and they continuously mock pop culture, but I have found the material recently to be a little more stale pop-culture wise than in previous seasons. I HATED Pee and Whale Wars and “you have 0 friends”. and even though Crippled summer wasn’t bad, I thought making the handicapped kids caricatures of looney tunes characters felt cheap and tasteless, and even besides that felt like they were going for the cheap easy laughs.
In short, I feel the intelligence level of the episodes has dropped a bit with the recent seasons.
bross09 - November 9, 2010
The facebook episode was pure gold Bross.
SpecialBrownie - November 9, 2010
I also didn’t find either of those episodes funny. There was 1 joke in the facebook one that got me, but that was it.
Simmsinns - November 10, 2010
yes. the Kid Drordy was the only funny thing on there.
Besides that its pretty much saying “facebook sucks you in” over and over. Plus, the Tron reference felt very weak.
bross09 - November 10, 2010
You didn’t like Whale Wars? the other two were meh
BuenosAires_Dawg - November 10, 2010
I agree.
You have 0 friends was Meh. Maybe I was strong with that one with “Hated” but it was more about my expectations. If you have little expectations and something sucks, you think “meh”. If you have high expectations and something is mediocre at best you thing “I HATE THIS CRAP”. It is the nature of our subjective viewing.
When I heard they were doing Facebook, I got my expectations up.
Wait…you Liked Whale Wars? It had a few funny jokes but the concept was stupid. they are ragging on this one guy about being some media whore blowhard and most of the audience doesn’t watch the show. I watch animal planet and had never heard of it and no one I knew had heard of the show either.
Thats like an episode ripping on casey affleck.
bross09 - November 10, 2010
Simpsons did it.
Villeslgr - November 10, 2010
A couple of times a year someone will mention South Park episodes that I have to see. When I watch I am never disappointed. Those guys still know satire.
Monsters of the Midway - November 10, 2010
they do. the point is you mention once or twice a year. it used to be every other episode was one you had to see.
South park is still a watchable show no doubt. this started because someone asked how the show is and they hadn’t watched for quite a few seasons. everyone is making a big fuss like I am saying the show is terrible. Its not, its just not as good as it used to be.
bross09 - November 10, 2010
Disagree completely as well. I prefer the last few seasons (save the current) over the first episodes.
BuenosAires_Dawg - November 10, 2010
Seasons 5-9 were the peak
Roger Dorn - November 10, 2010
I totally agree.
starting with Cripple Fight and the Shit Episode, and ending with Tom Cruise in the closet and a bleeding statue (Bloody Mary), those were definitely the best years.
I think a big issues recently is the obsession with 2 parters. I disliked Pandemic, 200/201, and this whole Coon thing. (that being said, imaginationland was actually amusing)
bross09 - November 10, 2010
I like South Park, but haven’t watched it in awhile.
Villeslgr - November 10, 2010
I’m naut your friend, buddah!
Simmsinns - November 9, 2010
THANK YOU!
SpecialBrownie - November 9, 2010
Rand Paul, is that you?
Villeslgr - November 10, 2010
That was supposed to be a Canadian accent.
Simmsinns - November 10, 2010
I’m kind of worried about the Jets because of their defense. We have a chance to win though if we can make Sanchez feel uncomfortable early in the game like we’ve done with Brees and Brady. Since the Jets running D is so good, I think McCoy’s going to have to throw a lot more. And I say “McCoy” because I absolutely do not see a reason why he shouldn’t continue to start.
emily522 - November 9, 2010
I’m going to assume that there isn’t a team capable of stopping the O line/Hillis combo until I see one prove otherwise.
elsandito - November 9, 2010
Pittsburgh? They already did it.
StuckInPa - November 9, 2010
that was an injured hillis.
bross09 - November 9, 2010
I think we will need to score a decent amount of points to win. This will probably mean Colt throwing a little more than he did vs. the Pats.
We have confused Brady and Brees, we can confuse Sanchez.
rufio - November 9, 2010
First things first – very nice and enjoyable write up Chris with lots of great points made. Very nice to see Elam improving, although is it my imagination that TJ is leveling off some and has not been having the same impact lately? I really felt that the penalty against Ventrone in the endzone was a bad call – only one arm was up and he didn´t hit him early. Unfortunately, I do see a rough week for Colt and Company ahead. This defense is very, very good and has shut down some nice offenses. Fortunately, Sanchez can really have some off games where he seems confused for the entire game. I really see a close, low scoring game, and we have a good shot to continue this miracle run we are on.
realmccoy - November 9, 2010
What? Not same impact lately? In the last 3 games, he has 2 pass deflections and 2 other plays that I guess didn’t count as deflections but he almost got the pick on them. He has been much more active and better in coverage. I guess he isn’t being talked about because his play isn’t a surprise anymore. he is still making plays on ST and against the run.
bross09 - November 9, 2010
I boldly predict this is the week that Ward comes down with one of those almost-picks he’s been toying with.
RelapsingDawgCatcher - November 10, 2010
He really does need to start holding on to the ball. We need a play maker, and almost getting picks won’t cut it.
StuckInPa - November 10, 2010
I agree on the nice write up by Chris part. Elam does seem to be back to making more of an impact and Wright did seem to do a good job again, simply by not getting beat deep. Also, Ward has made a few nice plays here and there and while the impact seems to be less, I think that goes hand in hand with fitting into the defensive scheme.
I think it is possible that Elam wasn’t at his best in the first part of the season due to there being a rookie next to him, so to speak. And if I’m on the right track, it is also possible that Wright wasn’t as bad as we saw with our own eyes, maybe because the rookie was out of position or missed a call. As this defense jells, and works together more and more, it’s going to make each individual look better by being a part of the whole.
I said it once before and I do believe, “The Time Is Now”
doggrad87 - November 9, 2010
The pass D has tightened up quite a bit, so it’d be hard to say he is leveling off. I don’t remember seeing any coverage problems this week in Ward’s vicinity.
Roger Dorn - November 10, 2010
Anyone pay any attention to Wright?
Villeslgr - November 9, 2010
i’d imagine he, along with the other corners, did pretty well, since brady always seemed to be throwing it to the TEs. he also had a nice strip near the end of the game that went in the books as an INT.
davus - November 9, 2010
ah, yes, I meant to mention that play in my Brownies bullet point.
Chris Pokorny - November 9, 2010 via mobile
Didn’t see much involving our corners for most of the game. I think that means they were probably doing their jobs.
Western Reserve - November 10, 2010
In a burst of excitement, I purchased tickets for this Sunday’s game. Anyone else going?
DisplacedBuckeye - November 9, 2010
I’ll be there!! Section 537 in the handicapped row. Stop by and say hello if you’re nearby. I’ll be in a Josh Cribbs jersey.
Buckeye Brad - November 9, 2010
I know what you two will be talking about…
SpecialBrownie - November 9, 2010
Uhhh . . . the Cleveland Browns?
Buckeye Brad - November 9, 2010
It was a joke BB, at my expense.
SpecialBrownie - November 9, 2010
Haha, we managed to get in opposite sides of the stadium. If I manage to roam far during halftime, I’ll make my way over there.
DisplacedBuckeye - November 10, 2010
Have a great time. I was just there this past Sunday, and it was awesome. Cleveland, despite its reputation and everything else going against it, is one of the greatest places in the world when the Browns win. Everyone was in such a good mood, strangers high-fiving and carrying on. I hope it’ll be the same mood for you after the Jets.
Also, folks, tickets are available from the box office, Section 105. I was surprised to find that lower bowl tickets, on the sideline not behind goalposts no less, were available. I just checked and there are some in the same section available versus the Jets. If you get a chance or aren’t already going, get down there.
Western Reserve - November 10, 2010
i was there, too … what a blast. the bars downtown were electric before the game, and then the whole place was nuts post-game. as much fun as i can remember having at a football game in a long time.
DontCallMeJoey - November 10, 2010
OT: because sb asked….
davus - November 9, 2010
Wow.
Defenseless safety?
9James - November 9, 2010
Simmsinns - November 9, 2010
Fantastic.
Bernie19Kosar - November 9, 2010
I just watched that for 2 minutes straight. That is beautiful.
Adrock2099 - November 9, 2010
If we meet, I owe you like 20 beers.
SpecialBrownie - November 9, 2010
All I see is hair, is this how Cousin It was conceived?
Bumblyjack - November 9, 2010
I don’t know about you guys, but I’m happy to see Cinci back in the cellar where they belong.
StuckInPa - November 10, 2010
See……who says the steelers aren’t good for something?
WilliamL - November 10, 2010
With all of this playoff talk a Steeler’s loss would have been more helpful.
Monsters of the Midway - November 10, 2010
There is nothing that a Steelers loss will not help.
woodsmeister - November 10, 2010
I expect a lot of injured Steelers this year. They have really opened themselves up for it by acting like the tough guys of the NFL and Harrison running his mouth. Plenty of other teams are going to want to show them up because of this I think. Hence 3 concussions from this weeks game, 1 guy placed on IR and the center maybe out this week.
browndawgbacker - November 10, 2010
Practice delayed today – players couldn´t get Bellicek and Patriot arses off their shoes LOL. BTW – don´t you think it is time we use some of Lerner´s money to sign some of our free agents? With the lockout questions, no other team will sign them. Maybe you could get a discount/fair price if we put some money in their hands before the labor situation is settled. I think we should try to sign most of the free agents, even guys like Wright and Elam. Even if they have not performed great – it would be nice if we wouldn´t have a bunch of DBs to draft and sign next year. Worst case you overpay slightly for the 3rd corner and safety.
realmccoy - November 10, 2010
Think it makes sense to not sign anyone to a deal until the next labor agreement is negotiated. Heckert said as much, that he won’t do so until he knows.
Roger Dorn - November 10, 2010
Nice write up. My overall impression is of a team getting gradually better and I think that is a good thing. I felt that the whole team as individuals played at a high level and you can see almost every player make one or more astounding plays in the game.
I’ve always said that the Browns will be bad until they are good and we won’t know that until we look back after a season of 12 or so wins and say “that’s when it happened!” This feels like the time at which we will be looking back.
Brownsyup - November 10, 2010
Remember when Bobby Boucher showed up at halftime and the Muddogs won the Bourbon Bowl? Sorry had to get it back to football somehow, that is all carry on.
Sipeis17 - November 10, 2010
anybody hear
buddy at work said something about cowboys releasing barber, anybody else heard anything and if so what i perfect situation if he lasted long enough through waiver wires for us to pick him up… marion the barbarion and petyon hillis in t he same backfield, that would be scary
tytryon biggums - November 10, 2010
wow. why the heck would they release Barber? sillies.
discoinferno083 - November 10, 2010
Because he’s been terrible so far this year?
woodsmeister - November 10, 2010
Who would you rather have at QB, McCoy or Sanchez?
NM Dawg - November 10, 2010
McCoy.
Dawg Nuts - November 10, 2010
pretty impossible question to answer.
DontCallMeJoey - November 10, 2010
Oh, no it’s not.
SpecialBrownie - November 10, 2010
McCoy.
That was easy.
Simmsinns - November 10, 2010
You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Dawgs By Nature to post a comment.