I was pleased to be joined by Brian Galliford, our Buffalo Bills affiliate, who run Buffalo Rumblings, to preview Sunday's game. Enjoy!
Chris: "When I first heard in the offseason that Terrell Owens was headed to Buffalo, I thought, "what the heck?" Owens is a player who wants the football in his hands, and with Trent Edwards at quarterback, I didn't see that happening. Through four games, he's only averaging two catches a game. Do you this relationship is going to end up clicking at any point this season?"
Brian: "I don't see why not - but only if the Bills can figure out how to attack opponents each week. They have the capability to beat opponents on the ground or through the air, but they've lacked balance and a lack of knowing when and where to attack in recent weeks. When they should run, they pass, and vice versa. It's really led to a lack of rhythm for the unit on the whole. But they have had rhythm at points this season, and although Owens' sheer involvement is low, he's made some sparing big plays.
One thing that should be noted: even if it doesn't click, it won't explode the way everyone in the media wants it to. Owens has been a choir boy this season - seriously. Very meek behind the mic, very laid back, keenly avoiding controversy. Whether you want to call it growing up or simply keeping his nose clean for his next employer, you're not likely to hear a peep from Owens this season."
Chris: "Fred Jackson and Marshawn Lynch. Which Bills RB do you think should be the starter? Should they split carries evenly?"
Brian: "They definitely need to split carries in some fashion, because both are excellent runners. Right now, Fred Jackson should and will get the bulk of the work load, because he's been outstanding, and Lynch looked mighty rusty in Miami. But Lynch is too good to keep off the field. Just add this to a long list of offensive items the Bills need to figure out - how to best utilize their two talented runners. You'll see both on the field simultaneously on Sunday."
Chris: "With Leodis McKelvin out for the season, how much weaker does this make the Bills' secondary?"
Brian: "I think it's safe to argue it actually makes them stronger. Buffalo was torched through the air by New England and Tampa Bay, and they were torched on Drew Brees' first drive in Week 3. Then McKelvin got hurt, and the pass defense has been borderline dominant over the past two weeks (although that, in part, is due to the fact that their run defense has randomly blown a gasket). Drayton Florence has played well in McKelvin's stead, and we're pretty deep in the defensive backfield. McKelvin's loss is much more detrimental to our return units than to Perry Fewell's defense."
Chris: "Is there an unknown player on the Bills roster who the Browns should be concerned about this week?"
Brian: "Frankly, no. Buffalo's big guns aren't cutting it right now, and the unknown role players aren't good enough to beat any team. If there's any player that comes close to this designation, it's rookie FS Jairus Byrd - he's replacing Donte Whitner (thumb) at free safety, and he's got underrated athleticism and ball skills. He's just waiting to capitalize on a mistake from a quarterback, and that might happen this week."
Chris: "The Browns' last victory came last year against Buffalo. Who do you think will win this Sunday?"
Brian: "Buffalo. I'm not picking my own team because I'm confident they'll rebound, either; on the contrary, my confidence level in their ability to play winning football is quite low. I'm picking Buffalo because they're easily the more desperate football team - jobs are on the line right now - and they're at home. That's it. If they continue to play mistake-prone football, Cleveland has a very strong chance of beating the Bills for a third straight season."
0 recs | 52 comments
On a positive note, We can still go 12 – 4.
SpecialBrownie - October 9, 2009
CAN go 12-4? I’m expecting it.
Dawg Nuts - October 9, 2009
That picture of TO is terrifying.
Roger Dorn - October 9, 2009
TO has BO.
Roger Dorn - October 9, 2009
Simmsinns - October 9, 2009
Brandon McDonald and Mike Adams beat for a TD?!
Bernie19Kosar - October 9, 2009
Yeah, had this been a video, you’d see T.O. tear the sign down after the TD.
Simmsinns - October 9, 2009
I’ve always loved the one where he torn down the “Takes one to know one” sign.
That shit was classic!! HAHA
Brownie's Year - October 10, 2009
I think Brain is making a case why Buffalo fans are beating us in the most delusional fans category.
L Train - October 9, 2009
Really?
He saying we have a chance to win but could lose to a 0-4 team, I think he’s pretty sane. Must be the water on lake Erie cuz we both suck
partyboybackformore - October 9, 2009
Speaking of delusion… someone put up a fanshot suggesting that the final field goal in the Cincy game was not good. I’ve looked at it a few times and by golly, it may be true. Now this…
Ryan on Field Goal
Brownsyup - October 9, 2009
I sure thought it was no good at the time. I haven’t seen any second angle on it to suggest otherwise.
Ryan Kelsey - October 9, 2009
I also thought it was wide when it was kicked. But the officals seemed pretty sure of it.
Bernie19Kosar - October 9, 2009
Same here. After it was kicked, I immediately shouted “no good” and was surprised to see the refs put their hands up. It was definitely close, yet the announcers didn’t even give it a second look.
Buckeye Brad - October 9, 2009
Watched it as closely as I could, and from that angle it definitely looks wide.
Roger Dorn - October 9, 2009
It was no good. But what are the rules on this? I don’t think we can do much about it, even if there is come clause for this, is it likely that they’ll change it to a tie? I doubt it, but it’s really unfortunate.
Simmsinns - October 9, 2009
Changing it to a tie does little for us, if anything it hurts our draft position.
Roger Dorn - October 9, 2009
Good point, basically the this discussion can’t really amount to much, but not that they’d change anything if it could help us.
Simmsinns - October 9, 2009
Is instant reply allowed on a field goal?
Buckeye Brad - October 9, 2009
Due to Phil Dawson, it is allowed.
Chris Pokorny - October 9, 2009 via mobile
It is only allowed to see if the ball went inside the uprights, not if it went over.
Bernie19Kosar - October 10, 2009
You don’t have the benefit of standing underneath both vertical goalposts when the ball sails over. The officials have this benefit. There is virtually no single TV angle that gives the fan this view. This isn’t rocket science, so move on.
elsandito - October 9, 2009
You’re talking to a guy that hasn’t gotten over the Broncos winning “field goal” back in 1987- when I was all of 4 years old. So, I don’t “move on” very easily
Ryan Kelsey - October 9, 2009
My point exactly. It was a bad call on the field, but we can’t do a damned thing about it.
We should move on. (Who knows it may end up helping us get our draft pick.)
Simmsinns - October 9, 2009
i read that too. my dad and i both thought it was wide. nothing we can do about it now, though.
emily522 - October 9, 2009
Makes for interesting discussion but nothing could have even been done about it even at the time it happened. But it is important to know that the game was THAT close. We should have scored first in overtime… no excuse for that.
One thing though… I’m NEVER for losing games to get draft picks. Especially this early in the season.
Brownsyup - October 11, 2009
Draft pick makes me indifferent to a tie or a loss.
Roger Dorn - October 11, 2009
21-13 BROWNS
Hoping to see a lot of young players get a chance this weekend against the Bills. As in, A.Hall, C.Francies and RB.C.Jenning WR.B.Robiskie and C.Stuckey, also continue giving J.Harrison the majority of carries.Keep J.Lewis on the bench preferably using him only on goal line situations.
Nuts4359 - October 9, 2009
If the Browns play in a decent manner, like last week, we’ll squeeze a win in Buffalo. I’m not too scared of them right now.
lol at “Enermy”
Brownie's Year - October 9, 2009
i think the browns will get the W this weekend.
emily522 - October 9, 2009
Forget about the 2010 draft how about now?
LETS GO BROWNS!!!
Nuts4359 - October 9, 2009
As long as we win 3 and don’t look like ‘complete’ fools, right?
Brownie's Year - October 10, 2009
I know some of you saw this on the Bill’s blog, but I wanted to share with those who haven’t.
Stick a fork in ‘em baby!
Brownie's Year - October 10, 2009
We’re having wings on Sunday!
Simmsinns - October 10, 2009
Yeah, that’s from ESPN. They did a bunch of them, some are quite funny.
Here’s the Browns’:
And the rest:
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=snibbe1/091006&sportCat=nfl
Ryan Kelsey - October 10, 2009
woops- there is half of them.
Ryan Kelsey - October 10, 2009
Haha. Thanks for half of them! That was worth it.
Simmsinns - October 10, 2009
I dont get the orange and brown one
TheRealSlimShady - October 10, 2009
it is an L.
Ryan Kelsey - October 10, 2009
As in Losers.
SpecialBrownie - October 10, 2009
compared to some of the others, it’s not that bad. rather have that than hello kitty haha.
emily522 - October 11, 2009
That Hello Kitty transformation is hilarious, and yes, a lot more derisive than ours!
RelapsingDawgCatcher - October 11, 2009
They should keep that Buccaneer Logo…I always liked the old Tampa Uni’s better, anyways.
johnnyphoenix - October 10, 2009
AHHH The Browns’ one is a slap in the face!!
Brownie's Year - October 10, 2009
The Hello Kitty one almost made me piss my pants
SpecialBrownie - October 10, 2009
Lol the Rams → Lions one is dirty. Too soon! Just soon enough: Tampa’s. Always appropriate: Raiders’.
rufio - October 10, 2009
The Rams one was GREAT. So was the Panthers one.
The browns one was weak I thought.
TheRealSlimShady - October 10, 2009
They’re all pretty good. But the Bronco’s are 4-0. (Just sayin’)
Simmsinns - October 10, 2009
the hello kitty one wins. the titans one is hilarious, too.
emily522 - October 11, 2009
I like the kitty too. I don’t get the Jets one… doh!
Brownsyup - October 11, 2009
Defense D
SpecialBrownie - October 11, 2009
I like the Browns in this game. I’m going to make this a lock <sticks neck way, way out>. Here are my keys to the game for the Browns…
- Offense and defense line play on both sides. I think the Browns have the advantage here.
- We have to run on them. Leverage the line, feature Harrison and save Lewis for short situations.
- Pass rush must be tenacious and disruptive.
- Keep their offense off the field as much as possible by controlling the ball. Don’t allow Buffalo to exploit the Browns questionable secondary with big plays.
- Will need a score from special teams or defense
I like the Browns in this game by 2 TDs or so. I’m going to say Browns 31-17. Good luck Browns!
Brownsyup - October 11, 2009
You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Dawgs By Nature to post a comment.